[QUOTE=BMW Lover]Maybach is surely not in the same package. Maybach is more like a presidential car.
But this peace of s**t is ,like u said, for the less intelligent.[/QUOTE
I can name a few very unintelligent presidents!!
[QUOTE=BMW Lover]Maybach is surely not in the same package. Maybach is more like a presidential car.
But this peace of s**t is ,like u said, for the less intelligent.[/QUOTE
I can name a few very unintelligent presidents!!
[QUOTE=henk4]give me a name 4 exampleOriginally Posted by BMW Lover
lol
Fire Bangle or give me back MY M5 and don't touch the M3
I can understand wanting to reduce aerodynamic drag ....but to replace it with rolling resistance/friction?Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine
I can't find the book right now, but IIRC the aero drag on the top of a wheel is huge as the wheel rotation creates a laminar flow which is OPPOSED to the direction of travel. So the theory went that by getting this below the laminar flow across the body the overal Cd was greatly reduced.Originally Posted by NoOne
I'll try and find the book later and get the complete background.
The front wheels were smaller in both raidus and width.
I don't know what pressures they ran. It may be that the rolling resistance was not greatly increased.
your right eggnog it does remind me of the f1 car with 6 wheels
John says:
so i had to dump acid into the block tank today
i'm afraid to fap
cause i got it on my hands
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)