What if UCP Was a Democracy?

[IBrake4Rainbows]

Your point about UCP not being a democracy (I was about to post the same thing) finalized the debate. No more had to be said.

Besides, if it was a democracy my absolute power would go to waste. Come to think of it, is it possible to ban Wouter? (Theoretically speaking)

So much for ending the thread

And I don't think it is possible, considering wouter Runs the site, and as such the person banning will require all of his access codes so that they could make the site function.

[2ndclasscitizen]

I smell a coup d'etat, then i shall be El Presidente!

[Spastik_Roach]

If UCP was a complete democracy we would all be screwed as 90% of the members here have no clue. how to run a website or be fair and equal.

Intense education is the key!

[Mustang]

As in, we, as users, vote for representatives for each sub-forum, and they all represent the people for each sub-forum, manage that solo forum, and convene with the other representatives for big decisions.

Govenor - Manager of sub-forum (Asian cars, American cars, etc. etc.)
Senator - Manager of Middle-forum (General forums, etc. etc.)
President - Supreme commander of everything that is UCP (Has to be Wouter, I'm afraid)

Banning priviliges should be given to senators and up, thread editing to Govenors and up, and thread deletion to senator and up, and BIG changes are made by senators voting, and the president overseeing.

President has unlimited VETOs and decision making powers in the end, though.
-------------------
What say you?

I say we have

Prince, Prime minister, King