Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 46

Thread: New Charger??????????????

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Detroit, Michigan (USA)
    Posts
    4,910
    you need to get out more dude.

    there are still many sports cars and besides, the true muscle cars were more sedanish even though they had 2 doors.

    it's not meant to be a sports car it's more of just a power to speed muscular type car.

    oh and also just becasue it has 2 doors doesn't mean it's a family orentated car.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,237
    O yippe !! A magnum with the back cut off

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Philadelphia PA, U.S.A.
    Posts
    343

    Yeah it's ugly

    Why didn't they just call it the Magnum sedan or something? Anybody with a brain can see that's all it is. I'm so sick of their styling allready, when the magnum and 300 C first came out I thought they were a refreshing change from the current norm in terms of styling. Now I just think they look like bricks on wheels.
    Most wanted cars:

    Ford GT, Aston Martin DB9, Nissan Skyline R-34 V-Spec II, 2004 SVT Cobra Mustang, VW Golf R32, TVR Cerbera 4.5, Ford Focus RS, Aston Martin Vanquish S

    Still waiting.....Shelby Cobra, Shelby GR1, 2006 Ford Lightning, Next generation SVT Mustang Cobra 2006? Mazda Speed RX8

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Purdue, Indiana
    Posts
    1,499
    This is a big disgrace to the Charger name. I agree that they should not have remade the 300 to have a Dodge front.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    Quote Originally Posted by Karrmann
    you need to get out more dude.

    there are still many sports cars and besides, the true muscle cars were more sedanish even though they had 2 doors.

    it's not meant to be a sports car it's more of just a power to speed muscular type car.

    oh and also just becasue it has 2 doors doesn't mean it's a family orentated car.
    Karrmann, why would they NEED 4 doors unless it was a family oriented car?

    IMO the car looks alright, but yeah it shouldnt be called a Charger or anything. They should drop the 4 door design for a nice 2+2 coupe design or something if they want it to be family friendly
    I am the Stig

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    ACT,Canberra Australia
    Posts
    6,086
    There shouldat least be a coupe option....

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Detroit, Michigan (USA)
    Posts
    4,910
    Quote Originally Posted by shr0olvl
    O yippe !! A magnum with the back cut off

    then why don't they call it the Magnum sedan?

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    Cause theyve essentially already got that with the 300 dont they
    I am the Stig

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,237
    Quote Originally Posted by Karrmann
    then why don't they call it the Magnum sedan?
    because thierrrrr retarded

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Detroit, Michigan (USA)
    Posts
    4,910
    but yeah, I kinda don't like the way Dodge is headed, just a whole bunch of 300 HP 4 doors with big grilles.

    whyu can't they get some more sporty like cars to compete with the Mustang and such.

    like Mustang like cars.

    oh and BTW I think the concept looks 100X better

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    Theyre called Pony cars Karrmann. Maybe if they had a smaller car than the 300, they could base it off that
    I am the Stig

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Wichita, Kansas USA
    Posts
    11,215
    I would say the Crossfire and SRT-6 compete with the Mustang fairly well.
    I'm going to eat breakfast. And then I'm going to change the world.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Big Wyoming
    Posts
    115
    oh and BTW I think the concept looks 100X better
    i totally agree
    1992 mustang gt twinturbo'd
    1988 mustang gt bottlefed
    2004 mach 1 resting in garage
    see pic's of my car's at www.turborides.com

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Detroit, Michigan (USA)
    Posts
    4,910
    Quote Originally Posted by Matt
    I would say the Crossfire and SRT-6 compete with the Mustang fairly well.

    well I think

    the SRT6 competes more with the Honda Civic Si
    and the Crossfire competes more with the Nissan 350Z

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    I think your right with the 350Z there Karrmann, but the SRT-6 is simply a hipo Crossfire right? So how does that line up against a Civic?
    I am the Stig

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Charger VS Challenger
    By mattgras1124 in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 01-30-2006, 03:04 PM
  2. Return of Dodge, New Charger...Can we see a new Valiant?
    By Luciferous in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 212
    Last Post: 11-02-2004, 03:58 AM
  3. Dodge Charger is Back!
    By McLareN in forum Multimedia
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 10-06-2004, 04:40 PM
  4. Turbo Charger Question
    By Need4Speed in forum Technical forums
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 07-24-2004, 06:58 PM
  5. New Charger for OZ?
    By fpv_gtho in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-22-2004, 02:41 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •