you know i never thought about that, thx
you know i never thought about that, thx
Had a quick go at it to, and a starting 3d of it.
"Religious belief is the “path of least resistance”, says Boyer, while disbelief requires effort."
I like the lines Ruim.
Not sure about the fron from that angle, but willing to wait to see how you fill it out.
"A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'
i like the 3d rendering but the front looks alot like a maybach
Sculpt the front end a little bit to make it more rounded to reduce drag
anyone here done fluid dynamics? like boundry layers, seperation, wake, etc...thats how you find drag.
autozine.org
Damn that is really close to what I have been imagining good work Ruim
I think you might want to get alittle more head room for interior space as well as the typical reinforcements of a roof.
I like the blockey front end
We need to see the back though (it's cut off from the pictures) and may I suggest that you don't enclose the engine in the same compartment as the cabin. It makes cooling that much easier.
Power, whether measured as HP, PS, or KW is what accelerates cars and gets it up to top speed. Power also determines how far you take a wall when you hit it
Engine torque is an illusion.
with all due respect there is no point in just using a wind tunnel. F1 engineers arent just pretty faces some are are experts in hydraulics/fluid dynamics before you consider finite element software and wind tunnels. While your car here is no F1 car you cant ignore drag! good luck anyways
autozine.org
Why?
For this project, a small scale wind tunnel test would tell you more than you needed to know, and would take you minutes.
Do a tare run, then stick the model in - there's your drag & front/rear lift values instantly.
Try doing that CFD - it'd probably take you weeks. Then another week to make a minor correction, and analyse it again.
There is a reason why, despite computing power, large budgets and clever people, F1 teams still use wind tunnels for most of their work.
I didn't say you should.
A Cd value is not that hard to estimate - it will probably be 0.3Something.
Then you merely do the following calculation, and you have a value for drag.
F(D) = 1/2ρAV˛Cd
You're going to need to do some quick calculation anyway, because CFD doesn't give you rolling resistance - so after all that time and effort in getting a super accurate drag value is ruined by a comparatively high error from that.
your absolutley right, i this project this is method will do fine. If i was designing a car. I was thinking more about more in-depth design processes as used in industry. A wind tunnel is a very useful asset but so is a fast effective fluid mechanics engineer equiped with a computer and a good knowledge.
autozine.org
An important question: where will it be built? China? (we need to shave production costs).
Money can't buy you friends, but you do get a better class of enemy.
Here is a generic example of the type of work carried out by an automotive aerodynamics development department.
Pre development
Competitor testing / benchmarking - wind tunnel
Research
Target setting
Styling/Design phase
Initial modelling of themes - CFD
Scale modelling - wind tunnel
Full Scale clay - wind tunnel
Aerobuck testing - wind tunnel
Cooling aerobuck testing - wind tunnel
Cooling airflow - CFD
Quality maturation
Continued aerobuck testing - wind tunnel
Prototype aero surveys - wind tunnel
Production vehicle status tests - wind tunnel
Your CFD guy's going to be sat there for quite a while, twiddling his thumbs
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)