I think its bad. Another Murano FWD transversly mounted piece of shit. What kind of SUV is FWD? Does it come with a VLSD at least?
Type: Posts; User: QBridge
I think its bad. Another Murano FWD transversly mounted piece of shit. What kind of SUV is FWD? Does it come with a VLSD at least?
I know enough to say that RWD is the best of all systems of systems.
It sounds soo mean but its soo slow.
and I'll add to that... decent FWD power.
Honda and Toyota both need to grow up and get rid of anything transversly mounted.
But they did do that because if they only compared 0-60 they wouldnt have written all those pages about the cars. Might of been a dif magazine.
I'll always take AWD over FWD any day of the week so...
I always thought that. Driving one is like running with a pair of scissors in your hand just dont trip.
I do love the TL but only if it was RWD. I would never pay over 25k for a FWD car. I would...
I saw this car on the cover of a magazine comparing it to the WRX which is stupid because the WRX is not FWD. It's FWD so I'll take the WRX.
At least it's manual or is that a fake pedal.
If it was RWD it would actually be worth it.
I would of spent all that money into making it a proper RWD car if I loved the car so much to spend all the money.
The video might show black smoke when it starts. I'm looking for it but I cant find it.
Some pics here. Someone has to find the video.
Even so it sucks to be racing behind that diesel because I drove behind modern diesels and the smoke will smother you.
This is history in the making here and nobody filmed it to post up on the web. What the ****? I don't want to read about it. I want to see it.
He cant. It's FWD and it's nothing but a shadow compared to the Monte Carlo real RWD platform of the past.
Nascar cars are RWD so it has no Nascar roots. They just market it that way. Not to mention...
I don't see any Fox bodys racing, they are all broken down on Ebay.
I see Cobra vs RX7 vs Supra vs STi vs Evo vs 350z vs Skyline vs S2000 and the Supra is always winning.
Well than if you say that there are cars that will do it cheaper without changing out too many parts which ones? I'll have to change my mind about the Supra then. The Supra does 9sec with a stock...
9sec is pretty good for me and I seen one or 2 do better.
You are right. The engine in this new MKV will suck. The MKIV is great for the quarter mile.
Good point.
The quarter mile mercenary. I love it.
Also I want an iron block with forged internals please to piss off the VQ35DE or the 450z and I also want some big ****ing gas guzzling turbos. I also want...
Even that torqueless rotary has more potential than the VQ35DE.
I tend to disagree.
Well I thought I was browsing the torque steer/understeer/no grip acceleration/poor weight distribution forums............:confused: and I don't know what D1 is, really.
and drifting is gay. Sure...
So what. The RSX was just another FWD car. You can buy a 90s Civic and make it twice as fast as a stock RSX (thought I wouldn't invest in a FWD car) so whats the difference?
The STi while it might be fast from 0-60 doesn't really have a high top speed and it cant put out a lot of hp. And since it's AWD like the EVO it loses a lot of power at the wheels and it's quite...
I remeber the good old days for cars back in the early through late 90s. There was the turbo Toyota MR2, the turbo 300zx, the turbo Toyota Supra, the Nissan 240sx the turbo Mazda RX7 and the AWD...