View Poll Results: V10 battle! M6 vs. Gallardo vs. SRT-10

Voters
98. You may not vote on this poll
  • BMW E63 M6

    31 31.63%
  • Dodge Viper SRT-10

    8 8.16%
  • Lamborghini Gallardo

    59 60.20%
Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 88

Thread: V10 battle! M6 vs. Gallardo vs. SRT-10

  1. #46
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    553
    Quote Originally Posted by 2ndclasscitizen
    there is no way a SMG is more practical than a clutch and H-Gate shifter. SMGs, no matter who builds them, are notoriously average for day to day driving.
    hmm...so youre saying that if you were stuck in stop-go traffic that you would rather have to deal with a clutch then just clicking the SMG into fully automatic mode? ...suit yourself i suppose
    .

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    mumbai,india
    Posts
    85
    gallardo......

  3. #48
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Sydney, Down Under
    Posts
    8,833
    Quote Originally Posted by BMW325
    hmm...so youre saying that if you were stuck in stop-go traffic that you would rather have to deal with a clutch then just clicking the SMG into fully automatic mode? ...suit yourself i suppose
    fully auto mode blows even more. Using the clutch is no problem for me.
    Faster, faster, faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death...
    – Hunter Thompson

  4. #49
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    West San Diego
    Posts
    18
    Bmw E63 M6

  5. #50
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    london/warsaw/Coventry:(
    Posts
    1,090
    the nuvorali will be a production car as the A6 coupe
    TVR, Heres to Peter wheeler and his last creationg of the Scamander.

    Coventry seriously sucks....

  6. #51
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    8
    I don't even get why anyone would spend their $80K on a Viper. 8.3L but only 500 hp??? Sure sounds like an American car to me.

    Yea I'm going to have to choose the Lambo here. I mean, it's a Lambo. It's the car every boy has a poster in their room of.

  7. #52
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Rice, Virginia
    Posts
    1,870
    Quote Originally Posted by Redemption103
    Yea I'm going to have to choose the Lambo here. I mean, it's a Lambo. It's the car every boy has a poster in their room of.
    not me....i had a Testarossa
    Last edited by targa; 07-06-2005 at 10:31 PM.
    pondering things

  8. #53
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    397
    by the way, the SRT-10 does 0-60mph in 3.9secs. Faster then the Gallardo.

  9. #54
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Rice, Virginia
    Posts
    1,870
    Quote Originally Posted by BMW325
    hmm...so youre saying that if you were stuck in stop-go traffic that you would rather have to deal with a clutch then just clicking the SMG into fully automatic mode? ...suit yourself i suppose
    why is everyone so afraid of a clutch? i have seen a number of people complaining about how they hate driving in traffic with a manual

    stop complaining

  10. #55
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Coldenflat
    Posts
    4,557
    Quote Originally Posted by Redemption103
    I don't even get why anyone would spend their $80K on a Viper. 8.3L but only 500 hp??? Sure sounds like an American car to me.

    Yea I'm going to have to choose the Lambo here. I mean, it's a Lambo. It's the car every boy has a poster in their room of.
    You bash the power-per-litre ratio of the Viper, but point something out for me then, because I am "obviously missing something". Just how does a high power-per-litre ratio increase performance? It does not itself affect power-per-kilo, so I do not see how having "only" 500 horsepower is bad. Also, no one seemed to mind when Pagani had Mercedes make their 7.2 litre 550 horsepower engines

    Also, please...put down more of a reason for choosing one car over another besides one like popularity. Do you like the Gallardo's looks better? Or the engine sound? Or do you not like the Viper for it's looks, or "brutal nature", or build quality? I am not trying to bash your opinion, I am just curious as to the deeper reasoning behind your choice.
    "I'd hate to die twice. It's so boring" - Richard Feynman, last recorded words.

  11. #56
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    11,391
    Quote Originally Posted by CdocZ
    You bash the power-per-litre ratio of the Viper, but point something out for me then, because I am "obviously missing something". Just how does a high power-per-litre ratio increase performance? It does not itself affect power-per-kilo, so I do not see how having "only" 500 horsepower is bad. Also, no one seemed to mind when Pagani had Mercedes make their 7.2 litre 550 horsepower engines

    Also, please...put down more of a reason for choosing one car over another besides one like popularity. Do you like the Gallardo's looks better? Or the engine sound? Or do you not like the Viper for it's looks, or "brutal nature", or build quality? I am not trying to bash your opinion, I am just curious as to the deeper reasoning behind your choice.
    good point +1 imaghinary rep

    a few things id like to say with say thought (i sitll agree with you though)

    viper= 8.3L engine with 500hp
    zonda=7.3Lengine with 550hp

    bhp perl litre:
    viper<zonda

    But bhp per litrer isnt everything. Generally a car with near 100hp per litre is considered a pretty high performance car, thus that is why cars like the audi rs4 (4.2L 415hp) and carrera s (3.8L 355hp) and new m5 (5.0L 507hp) are very fast.

    the viper is also very fast however they could have made it lighter by making the engine more efficient (heres where hp/L come into play). the smaller the engine the lighter it is, so why have an 8.3L engine and have only 500hp? thats a huge chunk of metal to have way up front, if they made a higher revving 5 or maybe even 6L engine they would save probably upwards of 200LBS with the 5L and still have 500hp. Then performance would increase, because of less weight to haul around. Even with the current engine they might have been able to mout it behind the transaxle, thereby improving handling, and eliminating alot of dive, squat and lean. The CoG would also have been moved towards the center, makeing better traction more than likely.

    the viper is a great and fun car, i know several people who own the new one and love it. It sounds great, looks great, is fast, probably comfortable, but i doubt anyone would like it for its build quality or image.
    He came dancing across the water
    With his galleons and guns
    Looking for the new world
    In that palace in the sun
    On the shore lay Montezuma
    With his cocoa leaves and pearls

  12. #57
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    11,391
    Quote Originally Posted by Redemption103
    I don't even get why anyone would spend their $80K on a Viper. 8.3L but only 500 hp??? Sure sounds like an American car to me.

    Yea I'm going to have to choose the Lambo here. I mean, it's a Lambo. It's the car every boy has a poster in their room of.
    its a lambo for sure dawg, maybe you can get it with lime green paint, and chrome spinners.

    a gallardo is twice as much as an srt/10. so why not pay half as much for something much faster, and that will probably get you more attention (seems like what your after )
    He came dancing across the water
    With his galleons and guns
    Looking for the new world
    In that palace in the sun
    On the shore lay Montezuma
    With his cocoa leaves and pearls

  13. #58
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Coldenflat
    Posts
    4,557
    True, the smaller the engine the better weight-wise. But specifically, it doesn't help at all. But also, horsepower does not matter all that much as long as the car is fast. Hey, look at the Elise. 190 horses, and it's faster then most things on the road.
    "I'd hate to die twice. It's so boring" - Richard Feynman, last recorded words.

  14. #59
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Rice, Virginia
    Posts
    1,870
    Quote Originally Posted by CdocZ
    True, the smaller the engine the better weight-wise. But specifically, it doesn't help at all. But also, horsepower does not matter all that much as long as the car is fast. Hey, look at the Elise. 190 horses, and it's faster then most things on the road.
    its also quicker, which is what matters when some hondaboy pulls up to a light next to you

  15. #60
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    11,391
    Quote Originally Posted by CdocZ
    True, the smaller the engine the better weight-wise.
    what? how wouldnt weight help specifically, it would be EVEN FASTER for the same hp and also it wouldnt handle like a brick on a string
    He came dancing across the water
    With his galleons and guns
    Looking for the new world
    In that palace in the sun
    On the shore lay Montezuma
    With his cocoa leaves and pearls

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT-8
    By Matt in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-04-2011, 08:00 AM
  2. Ferrari F430 vs Lamborghini Gallardo
    By mx512p in forum Car comparison
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 09-27-2006, 04:57 PM
  3. BMW Unveils New V10
    By lithuanianmafia in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 09-28-2005, 06:51 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •