Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Nanjing Auto now own MG Rover

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775

    Nanjing Auto now own MG Rover

    Chinese carmaker Nanjing Automotive has secured ownership of MG Rover for an unknown sum, after a three-way bidding battle spread over three months.
    It was one of two Chinese companies trying to buy the assets of MG Rover, the other being Shanghai Automotive.
    Although Nanjing was the smaller firm it secured a deal with administrators PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PwC) on Friday.
    "Nanjing will now begin to take control of the assets and develop its plans for the future," said Tony Lomas of PwC.
    The news is a blow for UK businessman David James, whose Kimber group had put in two bids to buy parts of Rover.
    Earlier this week Mr James, the company-recovery specialist who helped revive the Millennium Dome, told the BBC the combined value of his bid would be about £40m.
    Technical facility
    Joint administrator Mr Lomas said Nanjing intended to relocate the engine plant and some car production plant to China but to "retain some car production plant in the UK".
    He added that Nanjing, China's oldest carmaker, also planned to develop an R&D and technical facility in the UK.

    It is still not known how many workers Nanjing will employ. For a transitional period a rump workforce will continue to be employed by MG Rover Group and engine maker Powertrain.
    They will assist the administrators as they have for the last three-and-a-half months, following the demise of Rover in early April when it ran out of money after a proposed tie-up with SAIC collapsed.
    "In the meantime Nanjing Automobile (Group) Corporation intends to begin to hire staff to assist it in implementing and developing its strategy," Mr Lomas said.
    Nanjing had been close to winning the bidding war a week ago, but SAIC then came back with another offer, and Mr James put in his offers this week.
    "It is not really a surprise that one of the Chinese bidders has won as they were looking to buy the whole operation," Dr David Bailey, of the University of Birmingham's business school told the BBC.
    "However some had thought that Shanghai was the front runner given the previous proposed tie-up with Rover and the fact they had bought some of the copyrights."
    Production plans
    Nanjing had earlier said it wanted to restart car production in the West Midlands, but may look to use other sites as well as the former Rover site at Longbridge in Birmingham.

    Cars will be built under the MG marque and may include sports models and small and medium sized vehicles.
    However, it also previously expressed plans to shift production of small and medium-sized cars to China, and then export kits to the UK for final assembly.
    That has lead the T&G union to fear the Chinese company may not maintain substantial production in the UK.

    "Having viewed both the Nanjing and SAIC bids, there is no doubt in our mind that on first viewing the SAIC proposals appeared to suggest more jobs for Britain, " Tony Woodley, general secretary of the union said on Friday.
    He said the union would now look to make "urgent contact" with Nanjing for talks on jobs.
    Nanjing has indicated before it plans to use MG as its main marque in Europe while developing other MG Rover brands, such as Austin, elsewhere.
    Arup has been advising Nanjing on the proposed deal and chairman John Miles said: "The fact that Nanjing has bought the entirety of MG is an indication of their bigger intention to become a global automotive company."
    Property rights
    However, Nanjing's successful bid could start a prolonged legal battle.
    SAIC bought the intellectual property rights to sell the Rover 25 and 75 models in China during a previous attempt to take over the carmaker.

    Nanjing had previously rejected any claims that SAIC's ownership of the rights to the Rover 25 and 75 engines would affect its plans.
    And Honda - which owned the rights to some of MG Rover's technology - has repossessed equipment and blueprints, making it more difficult for any buyer to restart production of the Rover 45 - based on the Honda Civic - or MG ZS models.
    "It is an interesting legal position, maybe Nanjing think they can make MG models of the 25 and 75," said Dr Bailey.
    "There could still be some tie-up between the two Chinese firms. After all, earlier in the year when MG Rover and SAIC were having talks Nanjing had planned to be a joint partner in that."

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4708739.stm
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    9,465
    Well thats g--g-g-ggoo-gg.

    Sorry i just can't bring myself to saying thats any good.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    6,534
    Well, think of MG in the 60s, they weren't the most reliable car then either, so this'll be a nice hearkening back to the good ol' days. Except that any such hearkening will be a phenominal commercial flop. Well, we'll see I guess.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Sydney, Down Under
    Posts
    8,833
    I heard TVR wanted MG so they could get the factory
    Faster, faster, faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death...
    – Hunter Thompson

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    7
    ok,i am a chinese,i uphold it

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Land Rover Range Rover Sport (1ste gen) 2005-2013
    By nopassn in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: 04-29-2013, 10:04 AM
  2. MG Rover collapse leaves local importer high and dry
    By fpv_gtho in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-27-2005, 05:27 AM
  3. Land Rover Range Rover Sport
    By McLareN in forum Multimedia
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 11-26-2004, 12:57 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •