I'm looking for a new car right now. I want to know which car is quicker between a 92 3000Gt Vr4 and a 95 Eclipse GSX. Any comments would be nice.
I'm looking for a new car right now. I want to know which car is quicker between a 92 3000Gt Vr4 and a 95 Eclipse GSX. Any comments would be nice.
VR4 should be quicker in stock form.
Top 10:
1) Mclaren F1
2) Dodge Viper
3) BMW M5
4) Ferrari F430
5) Ferrari Enzo
6) Corvette Z06
7) Lamborghini Gallardo
8) 1967 AC Cobra 427
9) 1971 Hemi Cuda
10) Mercedes SL55 AMG
believe the VR4 is quicker.....but both are quick enough to get leaks
1993 nissan 240sx hatchback(stock) <<drifter, straight liner, road courser
"Horsepower is the force that determines how fast you hit the wall. Torque is the force that determines how far you take the wall with you after you hit it."
"Horsepower sells cars, torque wins races" - Carroll Shelby
"Real cars don't make power at the front wheels....they lift them."
VR4 is a lot quicker, but not as reliable.
i thought it was vice versa? i don't recall hearing many problems with VR4's, but i thought Elcipses crap their tranny's etc oftenOriginally Posted by Niko_Fx
Andreas Preuninger, Manager of Porsche High Performance Cars: "Grandmas can use paddles. They aren't challenging."
any pics and specs?
I forgot : I'd take Mitsu
^there both mitsu
Well, I've never heard anything good from early 90's Mitsubishis, so I guess both of them are problematic in one way or the otherOriginally Posted by clutch-monkey
They're both MitsubishisI forgot : I'd take Mitsu
i perfer the 3000 gt
both of them are unreliable but between those 2 cars i would take the vr4
why?
faster, looks better, whenever you want to sell it the price will not gonna drop as much as the gsx.
3000gt
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)