Obviously bogus. the parts recovered from the wreckage shows that there were windows on the planes and body parts were found.
Obviously bogus. the parts recovered from the wreckage shows that there were windows on the planes and body parts were found.
I'm dropping out to create a company that starts with motorcycles, then cars, and forty years later signs a legendary Brazilian driver who has a public and expensive feud with his French teammate.
This video is just a scam to make some money of naive people it's just pure BS, Btw not the first time a thing like this has been posted so it's getting anoying now
Kind of disrespectful to the victims to make up something like this
Last edited by R34GTR; 01-04-2006 at 02:01 PM.
Regardless the guy isnt so heartless that he would kill thousands just to get oil thats ridiculous. If 911 was a conspiracy, we can all just go kill ourselves cuz if we dont, our country will.Originally Posted by man 430gt
i dont know about you guys but i did a school newspaper report on conspiracy theory and i watched this one video. those slow motion frames of the security camera was 'chopped' and not fully released. there were at least 6 more frames. and it showed a 'missile' like thing hitting the building
i'm not saying it was, i'm saying that it was a smaller jet with explosives.... or an inside job involving a small plane
also i cant belive they didnt mention the 'no groundmarks on the pentagon lawn when the plane hit it' if you look closely at the photographs... there are no groundmarks on the ground. this also rules out the big jet theory. but so what, it wasnt a big jet, it could have been a small jet flying 12 feet above the ground. the other movie also commented on the jet stream
you know how there's a highway (the beltway i think) where the pentagon got hit,,, well if the jet were flying like 12 feet off the ground, it would have knocked over some serious s@#$. the jet stream would flip cars in both directions, it would also takedown lamp posts and highway signs that the plane and wings missed. this also rules out the big jet idea... after all WHO said it was a 'big jet' it could have been a smaller jet.
if you ask me thats completely BS
and if you go to www.sfogs.com <<or www.sfogs.com.sg or some rendition of that and find your way to pictures, they have a picture of the jet crashing in..... and someone chopped it to make it look like satan's face was in it
its just completely bull s@#%
THIS IS A SIGNATURE
(UCP'S biggest Zonda fan)
Stand up next to a mountain, chop it down with the edge of my hand. Pick up all the peices make an island over there
Jimi H...
case closedOriginally Posted by Vindesh17
as if this wasnt bullshit enough, one of the most-anti bush people ive herad of who blames everything on Bush wont succumb to this theory
thank you vindesh
He came dancing across the water
With his galleons and guns
Looking for the new world
In that palace in the sun
On the shore lay Montezuma
With his cocoa leaves and pearls
yes, thank you, and thank you MP for pointing that out
if Vindesh doesnt belive it, it is NOT true
THIS IS A SIGNATURE
(UCP'S biggest Zonda fan)
Stand up next to a mountain, chop it down with the edge of my hand. Pick up all the peices make an island over there
Jimi H...
I know a lot about planes and we have an airforce base that has many many refueling planes and they don't even look close to a 737. I'm glad to see that at least you can see that.Originally Posted by Esperante
um, if you're serious, yes...but i can't tellOriginally Posted by Zondaboy1
He came dancing across the water
With his galleons and guns
Looking for the new world
In that palace in the sun
On the shore lay Montezuma
With his cocoa leaves and pearls
Your local FORD dealer has plenty of cars in it too.Originally Posted by aNOBLEman
I'm betting not one of them looks close to a Ferrari.
Silly argument
"A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'
How comes my post was deleted?
.................................................................................:¦Back Again¦:.................................................................................
Did you press the edit button and then delete?
I'm just trying to help.
http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=31695
- Are YOU listed? -
Which there weren't. Read on:Originally Posted by man 430gt
Listen, bub, in order for your conspiracie to work, all of the families of those who were killed on the planes were paid off or created by the gov't. If several hundred families can BS us, your '60+' fireman, policeman and civilians can. I have seen almost all of the video taken documenting the towers from impact to collapse, and I don't recall any explosions near the base. In fact, there weren't explsosions from the base, as proven on video, unless all of the video was doctored by the govt'. In fact, even if it wasn't videoed, there's even more civilians who took flight from the buildings. Remember, 50,000 people worked in the WTC daily. If explosion that engulfed 5 floors near the base of the building occured, more than 60 people would see it.Originally Posted by man 430gt
How can you not trust the thousands of people who make up the US Gov't but place wholeheartedly your faith in internet bloggers who claim that firefighters or workers inside those 5 floors of the WTC experienced an explosion? If an explosion that engulfed 5 floors occured, it would breach the outer walls and burn everyone inside alive.Originally Posted by man 430gt
12 floors is pretty damn high up. Maybe not so apparent in New York City, but 10 floors is more than a hundred feet up. You said this explosion occured from floors 10-15. The explosion would not have carried down to the lobby, which is floors 1-3. As a matter of fact, your factual output has just disproved that part of the theory.Originally Posted by man430gt
You say they were in the lobby, and since firefighters were present we must assume that, since a small explosion from floors 10-15 could not carry, this is tower 1/the South Tower;as Tower 2 would not have been occupied as nobody expected a first hit. Thus:
They cannot see up from the lobby. So, once the plane hits the buliding they reside in, it could easily be mistaken for a blast occuring only a few floors up. I should add that the blast from the planes ws much greater than the one you claim occur. So, since they did not actually witness an explosion, how can they know where it came from?
You moron, the wings are where the fuel was. When fuel ignites, it combusts. When large amounts of fuel combust, it explodes. That's why the wing debris is not present.Originally Posted by Razablade
Maybe I should tell you what I said just because you're maybe not intelligent enough to interpret it.Originally Posted by Razablade
The plane of the pentagon destroyed 3 of the rings. Not obliterated, like the WTC, but destroyed. In speaking terms of engineering, such structures as the coliseum in Rome are destroyed. Look at the second photo I posted and notice how the plane carried on after obliterating the first building. The first buliding was the only building that structurally collapsed following the attack.
If the interior of your house burns out but the facade is still standing, your house is destroyed. If that facade falls and leaves nothing, your house is obliterated.
And yes, Canuck, the Pentagon is built like a rock. I'm actually rather surprised that even one building collapsed.
The reason there are none is becuse airplanes fly, and thus can fly into things without hitting the ground, if the pilot is skilled enough.Originally Posted by Zondaboy1
Ah, yes, I forgot. It's impossible to have a plane do a nosedive or fly at an angle greater than that necessary to scrape the ground. Pshaw! How naive of me.Originally Posted by Zondaboy1
Conspiracy theories are 99.9999999% of the time complete bullshit. In fact, this 9/11 conspiracy theory about the identifiction of the 757 that hit the buildings is akin to this:
Several thousand spectators line the straightaway at a race track, and a Vauxhall VX220 zooms by. Everyone concurs that a Vauxhall just went by. A few months later, someone at home watching a grainy video of the event concludes it was rather an Opel Speedster, and starts a movement that believes the race coordinators who fund the event rigged the competition.
I should start a conspiracy theory that the state of Idaho doesn't actally exist, because none of you have been there and none of you know anyone claiming to be from Idaho.
Last edited by Esperante; 01-04-2006 at 04:41 PM.
TOYNBEE IDEA IN KUBRICK 2001 RESURRECT DEAD ON PLANET JUPITER
In case you're wondering what just happened...
You all just got OWNED by Esperante
UCP's NO. 1 Source for Enzo & 69 Camaro pic's
I don't think you guys would be saying any of this conspiracy crap if you knew people that died on 9/11 or are in the area of nyc.
"We went to Wnedy's. I had chicken nuggest." ~ Quiggs
Agreed, although I have no direct relative/acquaintance that suffered through 9/11; however, my dad worked 36 hrs straight setting up an emergency shelter wired w/ emerg. phone-lines/internet services/food/cots/etc.Originally Posted by johnnynumfiv
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)