Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: 'Enhanced' supercars - yey or ney?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    51dg 45' 08.16" N : 0dg 20' 19.33" W
    Posts
    1,404

    'Enhanced' supercars - yey or ney?

    Personally (or 'IMO'), I think they're great. As good as supercars are now, I can't help but feel (as repeated as this is), that they're held back by emissions regulations, road legality issues, marketability in the 'luxury sector' and so on and so forth. In my opinion of what a supercar should be, these restrictions detract from the essence of what a supercar is. I am afraid, having driven a couple of very powerful cars - albeit nothing in the league of Enzo at al, that I am not counting fully controllable traction control and other driver aids in the list of restrictions.

    When cars that define 'supercar' in their era are as rare as the the truly elite that always fulfil those difficult to define criteria usually are; it's easy to see them as a piece of history that should be preserved in its original state. Especially when you consider the speactacular value of rare classic cars now (real Lamborghini Miura that's a 'fake' SV - £180,000). Cars like the Enzo, MC12, McLaren F1 (although that's probably an exception to the yet to be explained opinion), Bugatti EB110. Even lower down the scale in F430, 360, Gallardo, 575 territory, the majority of people who buy those will be far too concerned with residual value to consider 'unleashing their car's potential'.

    Companies like Edo and Novetec are turning the lower end stuff into the hand built, uncompromised masterpieces they should be, and stuff like the MC12 into the car that could never come off a production line in 2005 - but (from an engineering point of view) could have easily done so.

    What do ya reckon - abuse of heritage, realising of nostalgic dream or flippin excellent?
    www.crash.net/motoring/roadcars/news/home/

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Tustin, California
    Posts
    969
    it depends how crazy they get
    I am the Stig


    Ferrari Constructors Champions 2007

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    95616
    Posts
    5,357
    im in the middle. On one hand i like pure unleashed speed but on the other hand, i don't like the idea of messing with old exotic cars.
    I'm dropping out to create a company that starts with motorcycles, then cars, and forty years later signs a legendary Brazilian driver who has a public and expensive feud with his French teammate.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    2,567
    Yeah depends how crazy you get...it can make you want to cry when someone rices a 360 or something
    All about the t-tops

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Location: Location: (UK)
    Posts
    2,496
    I'm all for it, making a fast car faster makes far more sense than a slow one fast.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,552
    I feel that exotics should be left unmodified. If only you consider the value of unmolested cars of yore compared to modified ones. True, a car could be made a little faster if it was a hundred pounds lighter with a hundred extra horses but it's no longer what the manufacturer intended. Thus the fall in value.

    Imagine a Miura, fresh out of the factory in it's heyday being taken to a speed shop and hacked up to make it a little more able!? The concept is not very palatable to me. So, I'd sooner take a slower than possible exotic as intended than one that's been souped up. However, imo, the factory should release purer performance versions. i.e. Ferrari FXX
    "Racing improves the breed" ~Sochiro Honda

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Land of hockey, maple syrup, and hot white chicks
    Posts
    1,249
    Quote Originally Posted by PerfAdv
    I feel that exotics should be left unmodified. If only you consider the value of unmolested cars
    Hear that asia, your cars want their innocence back..LOL
    Be polite, Be professional, Be prepared to kill...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Sydney, Down Under
    Posts
    8,833
    as long as it isn't taken out of control, i don't care. The people who own them, own them, and can do what they like. I get annoyed sometimes when i see a very nice, rarer-than-normal sportscar completely ruined by someone who just wants something thats as fast as possible in straight line, like the SR20 powered E30 M3 I saw on the net. It was just built for dragging, so why waste a perfectly good M3 for that? Just get a 318i and use that, why destroy an awesome handling car just for straightline speed? What a waste.

    People who buy exotics are perfectly entitled to do what they want, its just selfish for car enthusiasts who can't get one to say "you shouldn't do that, you should keep it original so we can see nice original ones"

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    I reckon if its your car you should be free to do WHATEVER you please to it.

    If i had a Murcielago i'd be all too tempted to throw on a pair of turbo's and some new wheels.
    I am the Stig

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    2,567
    Ew rims...But Im all for the turbo idea.
    Go to Lambo meets, and your Mucrie that looks just like all the rest..is hiding pwnage.
    All about the t-tops

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    Well i wouldnt go out and stick 20' chrome dinner plates on it
    I am the Stig

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,328
    I think the FXX is what the Enzo could be. I never heard it, but other reliable sources say it sounds terrific
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    51dg 45' 08.16" N : 0dg 20' 19.33" W
    Posts
    1,404
    There are videos kicking about on the intermong - it sounds like an old Ferrari V12 F1 car - or in other words: rude.

    I don't reckon that old supercars should be messed with, because the only thing they were restricted by is the technology available at the time, and that doesn't count either!

    My 'rule' is that enhanced supercars should have nothing done to them that doesn't improve performance lost as a result of bureaucratic pressure - be they governmental or corporate. Save, maybe, some racing wheels.
    www.crash.net/motoring/roadcars/news/home/

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Californian by nature, living in Teggsas.
    Posts
    4,130
    I say nay. Supercars are already a little bit ridiculous as it is.

    Unless it's a classic. Those just rock. Then I say 'Yea'.
    An it harm none, do as ye will

    Approximately 79% of statistics are made up.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    553
    i say as long as you cant tell its modified...

    so no body kits, wings, gaudy rims, flashy graphics or whatever...
    but if someone were to bring the engine of their Enzo up to FXX spec, i dont see why not...I mean, eventually someone is going to have to restore or rebuild the car anyways, so why not mess with whats under the skin? actually to my understanding, a fair amount of classic cars in historic races even have had upgraded engines...

    as long as it doesnt take away from the original spirit of the car
    .

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •