Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 49

Thread: Z06 vs modded F430

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,654

    Z06 vs modded F430

    For those who say the F430 is faster check this out. The vette started at 2k rpm in second.

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...52883516340071
    UCP biggest mustang lover

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    437
    Badass... take it to lingenfelter and he'll supe that Z06 up even more... it'll be spanking Enzos in no time!
    "It's better to drive a slow car fast, than a fast car slow"
    - ...?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Deerfield Beach, Florida
    Posts
    5,802
    Love the sound of the engine

    Where does it say that the F430 was modified?

    500hp/485lbs tq vs 483hp/343lbs tq. The Vette even weighs less... Dump all that power into the F430 and it would do wonders. I hate to admit it sometimes, but Ferrari is simply amazing.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    True North
    Posts
    7,682
    Quote Originally Posted by Niko_Fx
    Love the sound of the engine

    Where does it say that the F430 was modified?

    500hp/485lbs tq vs 483hp/343lbs tq. The Vette even weighs less... Dump all that power into the F430 and it would do wonders. I hate to admit it sometimes, but Ferrari is simply amazing.
    but utterly uncool lol I think when people say the F430 is faster i think they're talking about racing...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,654
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Canuck
    but utterly uncool lol I think when people say the F430 is faster i think they're talking about racing...
    That is racing of sort. The F430 isnt faster around a track either.
    UCP biggest mustang lover

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    United States of America
    Posts
    4,875
    I didn't see it mention it was modified.

    And rev, I think you're just trying to spark another Z06 vs. F430 debate.
    2007 Acura TL Type-S (AEM V2, R-V6 Race/J-Pipe, ATLP Quad Exhaust)
    2011 BMW 328i Coupe

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    True North
    Posts
    7,682
    Quote Originally Posted by rev440
    That is racing of sort. The F430 isnt faster around a track either.
    Yes it is, Road and Track(guests of quatrroruote at the time) did a comparo between a few cars including the F430 and Zo6, they did it on a test facility/track owned by the publishing company of previously mentioned magazine.

    Lap times:
    F430:1,17
    Zo6: 1,19
    (gallardo was also faster then ZO6)

    0-100-0 times
    F430: 12.5
    ZO6: 13.1
    (Gallardo and Ford GT also faster then ZO6)

    Top Speed
    F430: 195.9
    ZO6: 197

    The F430 also pulled more Gs around the corners, was faster at deaccelarating, and had a higher speed at the Start finish, Highspeed section and low speed s turn by 3-6 MPH....

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    True North
    Posts
    7,682
    Oh also, F430 is faster in 0-60 0-100 and 1/4 mile...

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    brisbane - sub-tropical land of mangoes
    Posts
    16,251
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Canuck
    Oh also, F430 is faster in 0-60 0-100 and 1/4 mile...
    except it isn't, i thought?
    Andreas Preuninger, Manager of Porsche High Performance Cars: "Grandmas can use paddles. They aren't challenging."

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    True North
    Posts
    7,682
    Quote Originally Posted by clutch-monkey
    except it isn't, i thought?
    My info is from Road and Track who tested both cars and as far as i know are less biased then Ferrari or Chevy.

    Here are the times... 0-60 for F430 3.8, ZO6 4.1
    0-100 F430 8.3, ZO6 8.9
    1/4 mile F430 11.9, ZO6 12.2

    Although the Zo6 was 4ft better in 60-0 braking. But then it was 6ft worse in 80-0.
    But to the ZO6s credit it was .1 MPH faster in the slalom.
    Last edited by The_Canuck; 09-26-2006 at 06:56 PM.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,654
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Canuck
    My info is from Road and Track who tested both cars and as far as i know are less biased then Ferrari or Chevy.

    Here are the times... 0-60 for F430 3.8, ZO6 4.1
    0-100 F430 8.3, ZO6 8.9
    1/4 mile F430 11.9, ZO6 12.2

    Although the Zo6 was 4ft better in 60-0 braking. But then it was 6ft worse in 80-0.
    But to the ZO6s credit it was .1 MPH faster in the slalom.
    Road and Track is a joke. Motortrend got the car into the 11's and the fastest time for an all stock C6Z is an 11.3 driven by ranger of corvette forums. There were C5 Z06 running 3.9's in the 0-60 and the C6Z is tested to 0-60 in 3.7 seconds.

    I find it very odd that one magazine had the F430 ahead by 2 seconds and the other had the C6Z faster by 3 seconds as the car never gained any time in the turns on the Z.
    UCP biggest mustang lover

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    True North
    Posts
    7,682
    Quote Originally Posted by rev440
    Road and Track is a joke. Motortrend got the car into the 11's and the fastest time for an all stock C6Z is an 11.3 driven by ranger of corvette forums. There were C5 Z06 running 3.9's in the 0-60 and the C6Z is tested to 0-60 in 3.7 seconds.

    I find it very odd that one magazine had the F430 ahead by 2 seconds and the other had the C6Z faster by 3 seconds as the car never gained any time in the turns on the Z.
    Who did all this testing?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,654
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Canuck
    Who did all this testing?
    Motor trend did the testing and Ranger is a private owner of a Z. Car and driver has the Ferrari at 12.5 at 116 and the Vette is 11.7 at 123. Your numbers dont even make sense why would a lighter car with more torque and horsepower get beat from 0-60 and the 1/4. The Z06 traps around 124-126 on average.
    UCP biggest mustang lover

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    brisbane - sub-tropical land of mangoes
    Posts
    16,251
    Quote Originally Posted by rev440
    Your numbers dont even make sense why would a lighter car with more torque and horsepower get beat from 0-60 and the 1/4.
    pretty much what i was thinking...
    Andreas Preuninger, Manager of Porsche High Performance Cars: "Grandmas can use paddles. They aren't challenging."

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Northern New Jersey
    Posts
    16,602
    Quote Originally Posted by rev440
    Motor trend did the testing and Ranger is a private owner of a Z. Car and driver has the Ferrari at 12.5 at 116 and the Vette is 11.7 at 123. Your numbers dont even make sense why would a lighter car with more torque and horsepower get beat from 0-60 and the 1/4. The Z06 traps around 124-126 on average.
    Or perhaps you only believe the numbers that you want to believe. You and slicks should get married.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Chevrolet Corvette (C2) Z06
    By Matt in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-03-2010, 11:17 AM
  2. Ferrari F430 vs Lamborghini Gallardo
    By mx512p in forum Car comparison
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 09-27-2006, 04:57 PM
  3. Hamann Ferrari F430 Spider
    By Zondaboy1 in forum Multimedia
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-24-2006, 02:41 PM
  4. Hamann Ferrari F430
    By McLareN in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 01-24-2006, 08:47 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •