Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast
Results 76 to 90 of 95

Thread: First R8 Written Off

  1. #76
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Conrod
    Posts
    1,561
    On general terms, it's more reliable than most forums.
    www.secondaryperspective.blogspot.com

  2. #77
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Gran Canaria, Spain
    Posts
    3,525
    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrer View Post
    While I see your point, I don't think a mid engined 2-seater V10 sportscar is that sensible...
    I was talking about the current R8, but same would go for a V10.
    http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=31695
    - Are YOU listed? -

  3. #78
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,488
    Quote Originally Posted by Pando View Post
    I was talking about the current R8, but same would go for a V10.
    I was talking about the V10, I do agree that the V8-engined R8 doesn't conflict with the Gallardo.
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  4. #79
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    7,272
    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrer View Post
    the V8-engined R8 doesn't conflict with the Gallardo.
    Neither does a V10 version.

    Lamborghini built 5000 Gallardos in the first three years of production;that's only 1700 or so a year.

    According to an article in Car magazine 534 (Feb), the annual market for cars over £100,000 is 25,000. With that many people wanting cars, I doubt that Lamborghini would struggle that hard to net 1700 of them.

    I think the notion that the R8 will steal Lamborghini sales is fundamentally flawed anyway:

    They are both mid engine sports cars that share a few components, but are from fairly distinct brands and are separated by c.£40,000 (a Gallardo is 60% more expensive than an R8...). The notion that, because of the vague similarities, customers will all want cheaper R8s is akin to suggesting that no one would buy an Audi A4 because the VW Passat exists.

    Which brings me to the following argument about the two cars.

    The Passat and A4 are both VAG products and share components; engines, gearboxes, bits of interior trim, etc. Yet they are still different cars, with different characteristics and attributes. Why is not possible for the R8 and Gallardo to retain a similar level of distinction? They may share components, but they are engineered and developed by different companies with different goals - of course the end product is going to be different.

    Finally; for sharing an engine removing the "soul" -
    The Aston DB7 was largely build from old Jaguar XJSs and Ford Mondeos, but that didn't stop it from being the company's most successful car, until the DB9; again using an engine from a Ford Mondeo or two.

    Ferrari engines can be found in Maserati saloons, Pagani engines can be found in old Merc saloons, Koenigsegg and Saleen engines can be found in old Mustangs, and TVRs used to be made out of Ford Granadas. (In each case, as with the Lamborghini and Audi V10s, there is a degree of modification involved.) No one ever complains that they "lack soul".

    In summary:

    There are enough people wanting to buy expensive cars to warrant Audi entering the market, without harming anyone else's sales.

    The cars are distinct, not just carbon-copies with different badges

    No one (who buys these cars) cares where the engines come from.
    Last edited by Coventrysucks; 04-12-2007 at 11:48 AM.

  5. #80
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    95616
    Posts
    5,357
    The point is, Audi, a multi-billion Euro company would not have just built a $100,000 aluminium sports car just for fun.

    They probably did some research and discovered a niche to fill under the Gallardo. Also, it's a 911/DB9 competitor, so the Gallardo has nothing to worry about.
    I'm dropping out to create a company that starts with motorcycles, then cars, and forty years later signs a legendary Brazilian driver who has a public and expensive feud with his French teammate.

  6. #81
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,037
    You've just contradicted yourself. You're saying they're filling a niche but then go on to say that it's a 911 and DB9 competitor?
    Audi humbles Porsche. A new dawn starts today.

    Being nice since 2007.

  7. #82
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Birmingham, England
    Posts
    2,205
    ^ He prob meant a niche for their company, as opposed to the motoring market as a whole.

    Its always great when CS can put into proper words what many of us were pointing at through this thread, thanks dude.
    Porsche!

  8. #83
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,488
    Furthermore how can a mid engined 2 seater be a competitior of the DB9?
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  9. #84
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Surrey, England
    Posts
    4,000
    Would it not be more towards the V8Vantage, both engine configuation-wise, size-wise and price-wise?
    V0R5PRU7NG DUR6CH T3CHN1K

    Motion & Emotion

  10. #85
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    7,272
    Don't forget power (if you get it Prodrive'd) and weight-wise too.

  11. #86
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    95616
    Posts
    5,357
    Road and Track compared it to the Aston and Porsche.
    I'm dropping out to create a company that starts with motorcycles, then cars, and forty years later signs a legendary Brazilian driver who has a public and expensive feud with his French teammate.

  12. #87
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Sydney, Down Under
    Posts
    8,833
    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrer View Post
    Furthermore how can a mid engined 2 seater be a competitior of the DB9?
    Because a DB9 is a 2+2 in name only. There's probably just as much room behind the seats in an R8 as there is in the rear seats of a DB9

  13. #88
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,488
    Quote Originally Posted by 2ndclasscitizen View Post
    Because a DB9 is a 2+2 in name only. There's probably just as much room behind the seats in an R8 as there is in the rear seats of a DB9
    Still, one is a front engined GT and the other a mid engined sportscar, don't see how they are rivals...
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  14. #89
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Amsterdam/Heerenveen, The Netherlands
    Posts
    519
    Here in the Netherlands there is only 500 euros price difference between the R8 and V8 Vantage, the DB9 is a lot more expensive and has a V12. And with power the audi is somewhere between the 2, altho closer to de DB9.

  15. #90
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Conrod
    Posts
    1,561
    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrer View Post
    Still, one is a front engined GT and the other a mid engined sportscar, don't see how they are rivals...

    They are rivals for kids in forums, not to businessmen in showrooms
    Last edited by Ingolstadt; 04-13-2007 at 09:55 AM.
    www.secondaryperspective.blogspot.com

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Audi R8 Road Car (42) 2006-
    By Vaigra in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 106
    Last Post: 07-29-2012, 02:00 AM
  2. Audi R8 swansong...
    By Kooper in forum Racing forums
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 07-02-2006, 10:01 AM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-03-2005, 05:10 PM
  4. Audi Teams Face Tough Task At Le Mans
    By QuattroMan in forum Racing forums
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-19-2005, 10:55 AM
  5. 50th Victory for an Audi R8
    By QuattroMan in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-15-2004, 07:59 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •