Page 13 of 16 FirstFirst ... 31112131415 ... LastLast
Results 181 to 195 of 227

Thread: 2009 F1 predictions

  1. #181
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,488
    Quote Originally Posted by Kitdy View Post
    f6, this is why we formed KFL (Kitdy Ferrer Leon) racing enterprises to buy the Honda F1 team - we truly are experts and maybe one day, we will make road cars as well McLaren style.

    Our main car will be the KFL F1 and will have 2000 hp form a V16 and it will be the fastest/sexiest/stupidest production car . A primary goal specifically for Ferrer will be to make sure that it laps the 'ring in record time.
    I will start practising on my Xboxstation 360.
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  2. #182
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Republika ng Pilipinas
    Posts
    665
    Quote Originally Posted by Kitdy View Post
    f6, this is why we formed KFL (Kitdy Ferrer Leon) racing enterprises to buy the Honda F1 team - we truly are experts and maybe one day, we will make road cars as well McLaren style.

    Our main car will be the KFL F1 and will have 2000 hp form a V16 and it will be the fastest/sexiest/stupidest production car . A primary goal specifically for Ferrer will be to make sure that it laps the 'ring in record time.
    with that engine, i will not be surprised, providing it has enough fuel economy...
    Everything ends at 666...
    666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666

  3. #183
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    3,560
    Quote Originally Posted by forager View Post
    . GOD SAVE F1!

    Somebody save my eyes from any more of your appallingly written posts
    Chief of Secret Police and CFO - Brotherhood of Jelly
    No Mr. Craig, I expect you to die! On the inside. Of heartbreak. You emo bitch

  4. #184
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    10,227
    Not the proper thread exactly, but there is not yet a 2009 F1 Season thread and thisdoes not really warrant a new thread.

    Tata Motors will be sponsoring Ferrari in 2009 apparently.

    Ferrari - Powered by Tata.

  5. #185
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Wishing I was in Moscow, Idaho
    Posts
    2,585
    Quote Originally Posted by Kitdy View Post
    Not the proper thread exactly, but there is not yet a 2009 F1 Season thread and thisdoes not really warrant a new thread.

    Tata Motors will be sponsoring Ferrari in 2009 apparently.

    Ferrari - Powered by Tata.
    Wow. Just wow.
    Big cities suck

    "Not putting miles on your Ferrari is like not having sex with your girlfriend so she'll be more desirable to her next boyfriend." -Napolis

  6. #186
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Modena
    Posts
    9,826
    Quote Originally Posted by Kitdy View Post
    Not the proper thread exactly, but there is not yet a 2009 F1 Season thread and thisdoes not really warrant a new thread.

    Tata Motors will be sponsoring Ferrari in 2009 apparently.

    Ferrari - Powered by Tata.
    and it should be the main and only sponsor too according to what Luca (that's how Ferrari's workers call him) declaired to an Italian television.
    KFL Racing Enterprises - Kicking your ass since 2008

    *cough* http://theitalianjunkyard.blogspot.com/ *cough*

  7. #187
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    If true, its not too obscure considering the Fiat sponsored Yamaha's in MotoGP.
    I am the Stig

  8. #188
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Republika ng Pilipinas
    Posts
    665
    Why did Ferrari think of that???
    Everything ends at 666...
    666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666

  9. #189
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Modena
    Posts
    9,826
    Quote Originally Posted by Bleeding Heart View Post
    Why did Ferrari think of that???
    because Tata pays, because they already have some relationships going on, because in this way perhaps it would be easy to have the XF platform for the Alfa 169.
    KFL Racing Enterprises - Kicking your ass since 2008

    *cough* http://theitalianjunkyard.blogspot.com/ *cough*

  10. #190
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,486
    So now that we know aero is going to be significantly reduced for 2009, does anyone think drivers are going to take Eau Rouge flat out or will they start playing it a little safe?

  11. #191
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Modena
    Posts
    9,826
    Quote Originally Posted by LTSmash View Post
    So now that we know aero is going to be significantly reduced for 2009, does anyone think drivers are going to take Eau Rouge flat out or will they start playing it a little safe?
    slick tires could help them once again
    KFL Racing Enterprises - Kicking your ass since 2008

    *cough* http://theitalianjunkyard.blogspot.com/ *cough*

  12. #192
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    Its hard to know, the high speed approach of Eau Rouge means the effects of the slicks will be negligble whilst the different aero will be critical. Theres also 1000rpm less next year and engines that have to last twice as long, so invariably they'll be less powerful. They take it flat out now at 300km/h, but in 2005 they backed off but still went through at 320km/h.
    I am the Stig

  13. #193
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Modena
    Posts
    9,826
    Quote Originally Posted by fpv_gtho View Post
    Its hard to know, the high speed approach of Eau Rouge means the effects of the slicks will be negligble whilst the different aero will be critical. Theres also 1000rpm less next year and engines that have to last twice as long, so invariably they'll be less powerful. They take it flat out now at 300km/h, but in 2005 they backed off but still went through at 320km/h.
    what I meant is that despite the lack of downforce, the slicks would offer an higher coefficient of friction (or simply grip), so the two factors could balance themselves.

    possibly they would still take the bends flat out, but at a lower speed.

    back in the days the top speed possibilities where much higher, not because the cars were actually faster (even if in some cases it was actually so), but because right now the top speed is significantly reduced by the downforce regulations, the different gearbox ratios, and even a more constant use of power:
    being more usable and doseable, a good part of the available power is already used in the bend, so accelerating while exiting the bend generates a different and less brutal acceleration than back in the days.

    approaching those Spa's high speed corners in a 962 required a lot of control, the car wasn't capable of putting down all the power as efficiently as right now, so the use of the throttle inside of the bends was very delicate, but while exiting they had to pass say from a 50% throttle to 100% resulting in a devastating different acceleration.
    considering the high capabilities of such a car, drivin trough that corner at 100% of throttle would result in an unmanageable acceleration.

    right now they just need reduce the throttle a little, downforce and tires help them using way more throttle inside of the bend, I would say up to 90%, so even using 100% of the throttle inside of the bend wouldn't result in a massively different situation.
    indeed at the end of the Kemmel straight, the top speed isn't much higher than that inside of Eau Rouge and Radillion, the car is already near to its limit, so the acceleration is quite mitigated.
    with older cars, I suppose that managing to drive trough those bends flat out would have resulted in much higer speed.
    imo.
    KFL Racing Enterprises - Kicking your ass since 2008

    *cough* http://theitalianjunkyard.blogspot.com/ *cough*

  14. #194
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Republika ng Pilipinas
    Posts
    665
    Quote Originally Posted by LeonOfTheDead View Post
    what I meant is that despite the lack of downforce, the slicks would offer an higher coefficient of friction (or simply grip), so the two factors could balance themselves.

    possibly they would still take the bends flat out, but at a lower speed.

    back in the days the top speed possibilities where much higher, not because the cars were actually faster (even if in some cases it was actually so), but because right now the top speed is significantly reduced by the downforce regulations, the different gearbox ratios, and even a more constant use of power:
    being more usable and doseable, a good part of the available power is already used in the bend, so accelerating while exiting the bend generates a different and less brutal acceleration than back in the days.

    approaching those Spa's high speed corners in a 962 required a lot of control, the car wasn't capable of putting down all the power as efficiently as right now, so the use of the throttle inside of the bends was very delicate, but while exiting they had to pass say from a 50% throttle to 100% resulting in a devastating different acceleration.
    considering the high capabilities of such a car, drivin trough that corner at 100% of throttle would result in an unmanageable acceleration.

    right now they just need reduce the throttle a little, downforce and tires help them using way more throttle inside of the bend, I would say up to 90%, so even using 100% of the throttle inside of the bend wouldn't result in a massively different situation.
    indeed at the end of the Kemmel straight, the top speed isn't much higher than that inside of Eau Rouge and Radillion, the car is already near to its limit, so the acceleration is quite mitigated.
    with older cars, I suppose that managing to drive trough those bends flat out would have resulted in much higer speed.
    imo.
    Slicks wouldn't help you much if you got caught by the rain at the wrong place at the wrong time though.
    Everything ends at 666...
    666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666 666

  15. #195
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Modena
    Posts
    9,826
    Quote Originally Posted by Bleeding Heart View Post
    Slicks wouldn't help you much if you got caught by the rain at the wrong place at the wrong time though.
    pointless. even wearing heavy rains and hitting a dry spot wouldn't help you.
    KFL Racing Enterprises - Kicking your ass since 2008

    *cough* http://theitalianjunkyard.blogspot.com/ *cough*

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. ****ing McLaren F1
    By milad_ferrari in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 85
    Last Post: 10-02-2010, 01:11 AM
  2. What are your predictions for F1?
    By Homem de Gelo in forum Racing forums
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 02-26-2009, 04:56 PM
  3. Montreal GP dropped from 2009 F1 Calendar
    By ZeTurbo in forum Racing forums
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 10-20-2008, 06:55 PM
  4. Renault (F1-2008) R28
    By Sledgehammer in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 08-20-2008, 04:31 PM
  5. McLaren F1 LM & other supercars featured at the London Motorshow
    By Peloton25 in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 05-22-2007, 07:36 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •