Originally Posted by
f6fhellcat13
Ours have IRS, though, and most Toyota products the world over are just about irrelevant to gearheads, though they are by no means objectively "bad" cars.
I have heard that the Renaultsport Meganes are able to use their torsion beams quite well, but it does strike me as odd that the Yuroes aren't using IRS, with Honda even taking it away from one generation of (Euro)Civic to the next. Next thing you know we Americans, will be driving around in featherweight twin-turbo four-pot FWD Mustangs and all of Europe will be propelled by old tractor-engined buckboards.
Beam or no beam its all on how you tune it. They take up less space and allow for a flatter cargo floor. If you've seen how some the Peugeot IRS rear(407, one we have at work, in US) are laid out you can see why beams are so appealing. The way the 407 rear was set the shock had horrid motion ratio and the kinematic is rather "intriguing". At that point you might as well go with a beam set up and cost less money....
On really sporty models(like Renaultsport) IMO they can get away with more things since you are compromising more ride quality for out and out performance....on FWD car you don't want the rear to do that much work anyway...
Civic Type R JDM vs EU spec is kinda interesting since its rare you have the chance to compare the same car with different setup. The JDM model was superior but by all account that was much more hardcore car....
Last edited by RacingManiac; 05-16-2011 at 09:49 PM.
University of Toronto Formula SAE Alumni 2003-2007
Formula Student Championship 2003, 2005, 2006
www.fsae.utoronto.ca