Orca C113

[DwZX35]

Originally posted by Misho
This is asolutely true, but its doesn;t have the name, class, image, heritage, looks. . .

its performance is truly amazing, but at 277K its not cheap by any means. for the exact same price u can get a Murcielago, which to me is a lot more car than the Orca. they both have supercar performance figures, but the Lambo gives u a lot more than that. Anyways, these straight line numbers aren't the only perfromance category. Plus, no independant agency has tested it yet i beleive.

Autoweek mag did, they even mentioned that it was comfortatble, and dude, this would absolutly smoke a murc

[DwZX35]

Another boosting post, actually i'll just make a thread to attract more attention, like, Orca C 113: Fastest Car Ever?

[Alfahollic]

Is there anything to back these performance stats?

[DwZX35]

I think the stylings pretty good, but besides the stats, I don't know, I just know it could beat any stock car--and even some race cars--in a race, road or drag

[Misho]

i have a feeling ur really overrating this car.
i mean how can u call the styling good or not bad ?
performance sounds great, but with nuthin to back-it up.
i dont wanna diss the car, but i dont wanna give it more than it deserves, so until it actually shows those performance tests and becomes road legal, adios !!

[elmajul]

i think it is one of the most horrible cars i've ever seen in my life, here in Mexico we may call it a "naco" car. It has no taste its like a "wanna be agressive" and it has the most horrible headlights that you could see today. horrible, Horrible, HORRIBLE

[NoOne]

I gotta agree ... this car ain't easy on the eyes, as someone else put it "looks like a kit car". If I were in the market for a supercar this wouldn't make my top ten list, could anyone really compare this to a Koenigsegg CC 8S (my 1st choice), or a Pagani Zonda or a Murcielego.