Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 37

Thread: imports as a first car

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    In the shed
    Posts
    9,941
    Id believe that, they come with the RB30, and had the option of RB30DET so why not a 26DET? woulda been soooo expensive though
    The Datto will rage again...

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    boostone mass
    Posts
    498
    i agree with these guys, with one stipulation. if you really want to become a better driver, get a car with a measily engine and RWD. I personally hate FWD, i think it's for people that can't drive period, thus they go for the thing that's easiest to manage.

    I don't know a lot of the older nissans and such, but stick with a small engine in a solid car. You don't need a turbo yet. Your insurance will thank you, and so will everybody else on the road. With the RWD you can get a better feel for performance driving without killing everything. Also, it most definately can be fun to drive. My civic was fun to drive, but it was mushy and was FWD so it just plowed through turns. Maybe an old Datsun or something? Maybe an early escort? Early RX7 Fb3s or whatever?

    That way you can satiate your need for a new car without getting in over your head. 16 is too young to drive a real fast car.

    Think of it as dating. You don't want to get it on with a supermodel right away. You might get in there and screw the whole thing up, and everybody will walk away disappointed. Stick with something you can handle (and that can handle you) and when you're ready, play game with the big boys.
    And Iraaaaaaaaaaaan

    Iran's so far awaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay...

    ROR

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    1,991
    Quote Originally Posted by sandwich
    i agree with these guys, with one stipulation. if you really want to become a better driver, get a car with a measily engine and RWD. I personally hate FWD, i think it's for people that can't drive period, thus they go for the thing that's easiest to manage.
    complete bull

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Quote Originally Posted by sandwich
    if you really want to become a better driver, get a car with a measily engine and RWD. I personally hate FWD, i think it's for people that can't drive period, thus they go for the thing that's easiest to manage.
    Your advice on small engin RWD is valid to learn with, more power just makes things happen too fast

    But you're way out with FWD.
    it takes a diffrent driving skill and technique and if not undestood and practised FWDs are slow.
    The best advice came for the rally Minis.
    "Go in to a corner 20 miles per hour faster than you EVER imagine you coudl get round the corner. Turn the wheels in and come OFF the power, let the speed scrub off. The fronts will then grip and turn-in and then apply power as you start to see the apex lead to the exit"
    I can assure you it works very well
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    boostone mass
    Posts
    498
    perhaps you misunderestimated me.

    perhaps i misunderstood myself.

    FWD has its merits. In snow, in small cars. It's not useless, agreed. I think what I meant was that the car manufacturers go for what's easiest. FWD can manage where RWD can excel. Also, do note that the mini weighs HALF of what most other cars weigh.

    However, for most performance driving, RWD is more exciting and efficient. I won't buy another FWD car unless it's a mini, or if I have to.
    And Iraaaaaaaaaaaan

    Iran's so far awaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay...

    ROR

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Quote Originally Posted by sandwich
    FWD has its merits. In snow, in small cars. It's not useless, agreed. I think what I meant was that the car manufacturers go for what's easiest. FWD can manage where RWD can excel. Also, do note that the mini weighs HALF of what most other cars weigh.
    Even modern FWDs are excellent when driven correctly in rallies on some surfaces.
    But equally a light RWD will do as well or better on other surfaces
    However, for most performance driving, RWD is more exciting and efficient. I won't buy another FWD car unless it's a mini, or if I have to.
    Shame you've had the bad experience.
    Hopefully you'll get the chance to have a Mini reteach the fun
    RWD really only wins when you've got smooth tarmac and can repeat to find the perfect line in lap after lap.
    Also it clearly excels when the power is allowed to go beyond the 250bhp


    AND concur on the 'fun' part, it's more like playing getting a huge power slide on and balancing it fighting teh traction
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    In the shed
    Posts
    9,941
    nothin like a controlled powerslide on a wet road
    The Datto will rage again...

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Quote Originally Posted by Blue Supra
    nothin like a controlled powerslide on a wet road
    Just so I'm consistent about my road v. track comments


    Yes there is ....

    a 4 wheel drift in in a rear engine RWD car using power to control steer in a corner to keep you to the inside and overtake a racing M3 at over 120mph


    ..... me .....Brands Hatch, sadly the outcome a few laps later confirmed it's for the track not the road.


    so readers, please practise drifting and using power to steer on tracks with safety for you, others on the road , anyone watching and anyone just 'passing by'
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    In the shed
    Posts
    9,941
    Well in two weeks, ill be out on the track, so ill have the chance to "apply" my road skills
    The Datto will rage again...

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    In a shoe box, Auckland, NZ
    Posts
    1,710
    how about...
    Attached Images Attached Images

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    In a shoe box, Auckland, NZ
    Posts
    1,710
    and...
    Attached Images Attached Images

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    In a shoe box, Auckland, NZ
    Posts
    1,710
    I have 717 1st gen rx7 pic's, but im not gonna poat them all, it would take all week, so thats all. Obviously that's what i think u should get!!!

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    5
    well im looking for a second car too. id love to get a nice big TT v6 such as a 300zx or gto/3000gt vr-4 but by the sounds of it i would be stepping into a whole new and dangerous territory from a mildly powerful integra. but i was wondering if a smaller turbo 4wd type car such as a familia gtx/gtr or nissan gtir be a more suitable option.
    Last edited by GeNiX; 11-13-2004 at 03:44 AM.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    boostone mass
    Posts
    498
    it would be a very fun option....I looked at Mazda 323 gtx's (Not sure what they're called there, has a 1.6l turbo/4wd), test drove an isuzu impulse (again 1.6l turbo, double LSD's [think mini evo]), and now own an audi quattro. These are incredibly fun cars. The lower displacement engines should be cheaper to insure, and 4wd may actually lower insurance costs as well. I've heard of it with the Celica...even though it is turbo, the awd version cost less to insure, for at least one guy.

    On top of that, these smaller, very hot hatches pack some good punch, and are fun cars to drive and to toss around, my audi being on the much larger end of the spectrum. You don't get the incredible boost of a big GT, but think of how much fun people say mini's are. Check out rallyclassified.com to see what people do with cars like these. They are the ultimate rally car, cheap, quick, AWD, and easy to replace. The 323/impulse have really low resale values too, nobody knows what they are, but they can probably beat you off the line!
    And Iraaaaaaaaaaaan

    Iran's so far awaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay...

    ROR

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    boostone mass
    Posts
    498

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Which 1980s cars can be regarded as classics?
    By motorsportnerd in forum Classic cars
    Replies: 156
    Last Post: 06-03-2013, 07:54 PM
  2. Dauer 962 LM
    By Matt in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 01-22-2010, 05:47 AM
  3. The future of the car and the environment
    By motorsportnerd in forum Miscellaneous
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 06-19-2007, 07:15 PM
  4. Jokes - Car Names Explained
    By DarkPhenix in forum Miscellaneous
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 12-23-2005, 12:11 AM
  5. Worst ever car?
    By ShadowMoses in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 106
    Last Post: 03-03-2005, 05:24 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •