View Poll Results: Which compact car do you like?

Voters
25. You may not vote on this poll
  • Ford Focus

    6 24.00%
  • Honda Civic

    3 12.00%
  • Mazda Protege

    0 0%
  • Acura RSX

    10 40.00%
  • Dodge SRT-4

    6 24.00%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 27

Thread: Compact Car

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Gainesville, FL
    Posts
    649

    Compact Car

    Which compact car do you like?

    Ford Focus


    VS

    Honda Civic


    VS

    Mazda Protege


    VS

    Acura RSX


    VS

    Dodge SRT-4
    Last edited by Mattg; 11-18-2004 at 05:59 AM. Reason: Change ICON

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Fort Rucker, AL
    Posts
    3,092
    why are you making so many comparison threads?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Deerfield Beach, Florida
    Posts
    5,802
    Quote Originally Posted by Mattg
    Which compact car do you like?

    Ford Focus


    VS

    Honda Civic


    VS

    Mazda Protege


    VS

    Acura RSX


    VS

    Dodge SRT-4

    The only car in which you specified the model was the SRT-4.

    Civic? Which one? It ranges from 115HP to 240 (Civic SI Mugen in pic you posted)

    Focus 110 to 170 SVT

    RSX 160 to 200

    Etc

    I'd go with the RSX type S. Not the fastest, but it is the one with the nicest interior and probably overall best quality.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Brickland.
    Posts
    1,854
    the dodge is awsome! but its close between the civic and the RSX
    There is 3 people on a boat with loads of children running around it, the 3 people are: 1. Bob geldof, 2. Ozzy Osbourne, and 3. Micheal jackson, they're sailing out for the G8 live aid, they've hit a rock and they're sinking, bob says: "save the children!" ozzy says: "Fuc the children!"

    Micheal says "have we got time?"

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Northampton, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    7,989
    It was between the RSX and the SRT4 for me. I picked by which one will still be running in 100,000 miles. (not the Dodge) Plus I can't get over the word 'Neon.'
    [O o)O=\x/=O(o O]

    The things we do for girls who won't sleep with us.

    Patrick says:
    dads is too long so it wont fit
    so i took hers out
    and put mine in

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,190
    The Focus.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Amsterdam/Heerenveen, The Netherlands
    Posts
    519
    These are mostly cars for american market I guess, a few I dont know and quite a lot im missing. But I'll go for the focus as it is the only car of these (exept for the civic) I know something about..

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,552
    RSX type-S, type-R if possible Sure the SRT-4 is faster but outside of that turbo it's a Neon
    "Racing improves the breed" ~Sochiro Honda

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,190
    Quote Originally Posted by PerfAdv
    RSX type-S, type-R if possible Sure the SRT-4 is faster but outside of that turbo it's a Neon
    And that is no good thing. The Neon is a drastic car.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,552
    Quote Originally Posted by RS6
    And that is no good thing. The Neon is a drastic car.
    I don't think I understand you...you like Neon? The SRT-4 is little more than a factory turbo-job of a regular Neon. The carbonfiber Neon is a different beast, if you meant that one by drastic.
    "Racing improves the breed" ~Sochiro Honda

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Bozeman, Montana USA
    Posts
    31

    Other

    None of the Above.

    Give me my GTI 1.8T before any of the ones in your list.

    If I had to take one from the list the RSX.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Northampton, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    7,989
    Quote Originally Posted by 2002GTI
    None of the Above.

    Give me my GTI 1.8T before any of the ones in your list.

    If I had to take one from the list the RSX.
    A chipped 1.8T can nevAr lose!!!111oneoneone11bbq
    [O o)O=\x/=O(o O]

    The things we do for girls who won't sleep with us.

    Patrick says:
    dads is too long so it wont fit
    so i took hers out
    and put mine in

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Californian by nature, living in Teggsas.
    Posts
    4,130
    None of those...they're all torqueless (with the exception of the Neon, but then again it IS a Neon...) FWD cars, not my style. I'd pick the Focus though, just because it's American, I had one and it was reasonably comfy, and I'm sure my problems were just first-year bugs that had to be ironed out.
    An it harm none, do as ye will

    Approximately 79% of statistics are made up.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Quote Originally Posted by jcp123
    I'd pick the Focus though, just because it's American, I had one and it was reasonably comfy, and I'm sure my problems were just first-year bugs that had to be ironed out.
    We're at the same place again

    you like the American Focus we presume.

    Which version/variant ?

    If we dont' name these things then we are talking about different cars - US Focus is one gen behind the European variants ( plus some ).
    But I have to say with the new Focus released I'd prefer to stay at the previous gen
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Californian by nature, living in Teggsas.
    Posts
    4,130
    Actually I have seen the European Focus (I have a subscription to Auto Motor und Sport), and I was duly impressed - though even the American ("old") version is still not a bad car, I much prefer the interior of the 'new' one.

    I had a 2000 ZTS sedan, so a ZTS is probably the one I'd go for, what with it being the luxo model. But this time around, it'd be with a 5-speed stick and the 2.3l Four if possible) rather than the 2.0 16v and automatic that I had.
    An it harm none, do as ye will

    Approximately 79% of statistics are made up.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Which 1980s cars can be regarded as classics?
    By motorsportnerd in forum Classic cars
    Replies: 156
    Last Post: 06-03-2013, 07:54 PM
  2. Dauer 962 LM
    By Matt in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 01-22-2010, 05:47 AM
  3. The future of the car and the environment
    By motorsportnerd in forum Miscellaneous
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 06-19-2007, 07:15 PM
  4. Jokes - Car Names Explained
    By DarkPhenix in forum Miscellaneous
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 12-23-2005, 12:11 AM
  5. Worst ever car?
    By ShadowMoses in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 106
    Last Post: 03-03-2005, 05:24 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •