Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 131

Thread: Chevrolet Camaro (5th gen) 2009-2015

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    brisbane - sub-tropical land of mangoes
    Posts
    16,251
    how heavy is the camaro going to be? they said it was to be lighter than it's donor car, so, like 1600kg?
    Andreas Preuninger, Manager of Porsche High Performance Cars: "Grandmas can use paddles. They aren't challenging."

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    US
    Posts
    736
    Latest info says 3750lbs/1700kg for the 300bhp version, and 3860lbs/1750kg for the 422:

    V6: 5.67kg/bhp
    SS: 4.15kg/bhp

    Compare that to the Challengers and Mustangs:

    SRT8: 4.42kg/bhp
    R/T: 4.95kg/bhp
    SE: 6.93kb/bhp.

    GT500: 3.56kg/bhp
    GT: 5.27kg/bhp
    V6: 7.24kg/bhp

    2010 GT500: 3.32kg/bhp
    2010 GT: 5.15kg/bhp
    2010 V6: 7.35kb/bhp

    Of course, I know there are differences in drive train loss and so on but it still paints an interesting picture.
    Turning money into memories.

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    brisbane - sub-tropical land of mangoes
    Posts
    16,251
    so in terms of power to weight, it's ahead of it's competitors bar the GT500?
    either way, it's still pretty heavy that's really not far off what the VE weighs, and i'd thought they could lop off a lot of weight being a coupe/pony car
    Andreas Preuninger, Manager of Porsche High Performance Cars: "Grandmas can use paddles. They aren't challenging."

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    US
    Posts
    736
    Yessir, and the SS is supposedly going to end up at around $31k MSRP, although I do think that's a little low. The V6 will begin at $25k MSRP. In comparison the 2010 GT500 is right at $45k MSRP.

    It does look like Chevy has a strong card on its hand with the new Camaro. Heavy, but strong. Modern musclecars are more clydesdales than pony cars really.
    Turning money into memories.

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    501
    Ahead in power per price, not power to weight. The SS and GT500 are very close in weight, with the Shelby pushing more horses (so to speak).
    "Wise man say: Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."

  6. #66
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Kuwait
    Posts
    242

    2010 Chevrolet Camaro - Kuwait

    2010 Chevrolet Camaro at the dealer in Kuwait, just released on the first of September 09.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  7. #67
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Kuwait
    Posts
    242

    2010 Chevrolet Camaro - Kuwait

    2010 Chevrolet Camaro - Kuwait
    Attached Images Attached Images

  8. #68
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Kuwait
    Posts
    242

    2010 Chevrolet Camaro - Kuwait (last)

    2010 Chevrolet Camaro - Kuwait (last set)
    Attached Images Attached Images

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    10,227
    550 hp LSA powered Z28? Probably!

    Spied pre-press days at SEMA.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    501
    Geez, I hope that's not the Z28. Shouldn't they be making the higher performance models MORE aerodynamic up front? Seems to me that the frontend of the V6 model is the sleekest, and best looking.
    "Wise man say: Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."

  11. #71
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    10,227
    Jalopnik says it's not a Z28, but in fact a one off by Jay Leno.

  12. #72
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Modena
    Posts
    9,826
    Quote Originally Posted by ThisBlood147 View Post
    Geez, I hope that's not the Z28. Shouldn't they be making the higher performance models MORE aerodynamic up front? Seems to me that the frontend of the V6 model is the sleekest, and best looking.
    Which has nothing to do with aerodynamics, right?
    KFL Racing Enterprises - Kicking your ass since 2008

    *cough* http://theitalianjunkyard.blogspot.com/ *cough*

  13. #73
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    501
    Quote Originally Posted by LeonOfTheDead View Post
    Which has nothing to do with aerodynamics, right?
    Being the sleekest and having the smallest front profile does....which is what I was getting at. It being better looking was just my opinion on the styling. The SS has a pointless "mail slot" and bulkier lower valance than the V6.
    "Wise man say: Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."

  14. #74
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Modena
    Posts
    9,826
    Quote Originally Posted by ThisBlood147 View Post
    Being the sleekest and having the smallest front profile does....which is what I was getting at. It being better looking was just my opinion on the styling. The SS has a pointless "mail slot" and bulkier lower valance than the V6.
    I'm not sure if that's going to make any sensible difference, that's my point.
    the whole design doesn't look much aerodynamic, so it isn't the first thing that comes to (my) mind when I think of a better performing Camaro.
    It didn't prevent people from buying the Cobra GT500, and it's problem is reportedly only the high price, no one ever considered its aerodynamics.
    KFL Racing Enterprises - Kicking your ass since 2008

    *cough* http://theitalianjunkyard.blogspot.com/ *cough*

  15. #75
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Wishing I was in Moscow, Idaho
    Posts
    2,585
    Quote Originally Posted by ThisBlood147 View Post
    Being the sleekest and having the smallest front profile does....which is what I was getting at. It being better looking was just my opinion on the styling. The SS has a pointless "mail slot" and bulkier lower valance than the V6.
    Remember that "aerodynamics" isn't just low drag, it's also trying to reduce lift or in some cases actually increase downforce. That bulky lower valence is trying to reduce lift which is a lot more important as you add power than trying to reduce drag.
    Big cities suck

    "Not putting miles on your Ferrari is like not having sex with your girlfriend so she'll be more desirable to her next boyfriend." -Napolis

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Really useful performance listings...
    By Egg Nog in forum Technical forums
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 04-18-2021, 05:13 PM
  2. all cars all years 0-60 and 1/4mile time
    By matheus in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 04-26-2015, 06:29 PM
  3. Gran Turismo 5
    By Sauc3 in forum Gaming
    Replies: 1020
    Last Post: 05-19-2014, 03:16 PM
  4. Hide-Out Index
    By Sauc3 in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 06-20-2008, 02:43 AM
  5. Chevrolet Camaro Concept 2006
    By Matt in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 57
    Last Post: 01-14-2007, 01:13 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •