Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 24

Thread: M3 Evo?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,350

    M3 Evo?

    So like any red-blooded car nut, I was devastated by the news of BMW not planning to make a CSL version of the current M3.

    Sure, the tarted-up versions of the X5 and X6 will probably sell up a storm, but does that truly represent what you stand for as a company? I mean come on!


    Whatever.


    But this got me thinking, can BMW maybe make up for this travesty of justice? And by that I mean cater for us enthusiast types?
    Well, I read the other day BMW intends reviving badges of the past (CSL not included), tii being the most notable. So, why not Evo?

    Think about it, BMW brings out an M3 Evo say round about 2010, featuring more spice for the same price. Sounds like a good idea?


    Well, here's what I think they can do:


    Take one standard 2 door E92 M3:




    Revise the bumper a bit, most notably the air splitter to maybe assist high-speed stability. Increase the intakes ever so slightly as well to ensure better breathing to the revisited 4.0 V8 (now featuring direct fuel injection and dry-sump lubrication):




    Which brings us to the posterior of the car. Now, I know most find the rear of this car acceptable. Some might even say pleasant.
    I just so happen to fall in neither of the above categories. I think the idea of trying to slap on the same "face" on the back of the car is a silly idea, especially when some of the features serve no purpose at all. And you have a huge piece of exhaust sticking out, even from a shot that's been taken from a relatively higher position:




    So what would happen if BMW decided to stick with trying to keep some sort of theme going between the front and the back, but at least making some sort of attempt at making it look a bit neater?
    I'd like to think that they'd have no trouble at all in repackaging the exhaust system in such a way to at least hide the most bits of it from view, not including the outlets (which now sit in what I personally think is a better place). While they're at it, they might want to move the inner parts of the light-clusters to where they should've been in the first place.
    And if we cant have CSL, at least give us its wing!:




    Rear light clusters update:

    Last edited by Kooper; 09-18-2008 at 12:25 PM. Reason: 2nd-language failing me again

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Stop looking at me! Look at me! Stop looking at me!
    Posts
    1,873
    I think the rear lights matched better before, this looks mismatched. I do like the idea of subtle enhancements for performance, but I think two that would work well would be a whole front air damn instead of a split one, and maybe a bit more flared wheel arches. Or maybe not on the arches.
    I dont if I'll make home tonight
    But I know I can swim
    under the Tahitian moon

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,350
    Quote Originally Posted by digitalcraft View Post
    I think the rear lights matched better before, this looks mismatched.
    Thanks for the feedback, duly noted. Updated the lights to have the light elements line up.

    Call me old-fashioned, but I really don't get the upside-down L-shaped Beemer lights of late.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,489
    I quite like it, but I prefer the exhausts below the bumper.

    Other than that it's good, altough the changes are minimal especially on the front.
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,350
    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrer View Post
    I quite like it, but I prefer the exhausts below the bumper.

    Other than that it's good, altough the changes are minimal especially on the front.
    Thanks Ferrer

    Yeah, I know the chop contains a minimal amount of changes. The front only contains the bigger intakes and extended splitters.

    I'll post a much revised version shortly though.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Auckland, NZ
    Posts
    1,189
    I can't see the difference in the front end.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    GDL
    Posts
    694
    Quote Originally Posted by Roentgen View Post
    I can't see the difference in the front end.
    check below the side intakes
    www.myspace.com/kasaky

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Posts: 30,245
    Posts
    7,352
    nice. i like that. but i'd keep the exhausts in the same place. just further apart.

    and LOWER IT

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    └A & Connecticlump
    Posts
    5,367
    Nice job. turned a bad looking back end (IMHO) into a reasonably good looking back end. I think you did nto change the front enough, but that is just because i think the standard front looks horrible.
    "Kimi, can you improve on your [race] finish?"
    "No. My Finnish is fine; I am from Finland. Do you have any water?"

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Warsaw
    Posts
    4,448
    i like your rear lights more than the factory ones
    12 cylinders or walk!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    643
    Don't mind the changes you've made to this. Looks pretty good, especially the rear.
    "Some days, you just can't get rid of a bomb!"
    "Life is short, drive fast!" - Lamborghini
    "How's that for a slice of fried gold?"
    "I'll take the case!" - Harvey Birdman

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    255
    Nice work Kooper as usual. I would like to see that single hole in the front though. You know... like this one:



    What do you guys reckon?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    East Coast of the United States
    Posts
    12,007
    What's that hole for? I always wanted to know. It doesn't seem to be a tow hook.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,350
    Quote Originally Posted by NSXType-R View Post
    What's that hole for? I always wanted to know. It doesn't seem to be a tow hook.

    I think it might be RAM air induction, not sure though...

    Truth be tolld, I be a little bit pissed at the mopmtnet.



    ....

    Good to be alive.



    EDIT: Stll a wee bit cross-eyed, but here be a little preview of what;s fo come, just as soon as i can focus agins:




    So, on the right wtrack to far?
    Last edited by Kooper; 09-20-2008 at 05:52 PM.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    308
    Man I really like that design...I'll take two please.
    Oo____oO GT-R

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Famous Touring Cars
    By motorsportnerd in forum Racing forums
    Replies: 353
    Last Post: 07-04-2010, 08:57 AM
  2. BMW M3 (E92) Coupe 2007-2013
    By carreragt10 in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 05-08-2010, 11:46 AM
  3. BMW E30 M3 Evo III vs. Mercedes-Benz 190E 2.5 16v
    By dcsbeemer in forum Car comparison
    Replies: 72
    Last Post: 04-30-2010, 03:05 PM
  4. BMW M3 (E90) Sedan 2007-2011
    By Duell in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 08-08-2008, 08:29 AM
  5. C&D review Evo 9.
    By Quiggs in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 07-05-2006, 05:44 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •