Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 48

Thread: Your Car(s): Transmission and Axle Ratio?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    San Fernando Valley, Calif.
    Posts
    6,794

    Your Car(s): Transmission and Axle Ratio?

    I am curious about UCP members cars... what type of transmission (manual or automatic) and the axle ratio.

    I'll start...

    1969 Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham: 3-speed auto, 3.21:1 (orginally 2.94:1)

    1976 Cadillac Fleetwood 75 Limousine: 3-speed auto, 3.15:1

    1995 Lincoln Town Car Signature: 4-speed auto, 3.08:1
    '76 Cadillac Fleetwood Seventy-Five Limousine, '95 Lincoln Town Car.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    6,065
    2006 VW Jetta GLI: 6-speed Manual, 3.94
    2000 GMC Sierra 4x4: 4-speed Automatic, 3.42
    1970 MG Midget: 4-speed Manual, 5.38
    Last edited by johnnynumfiv; 03-14-2009 at 02:25 PM.
    "We went to Wnedy's. I had chicken nuggest." ~ Quiggs

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,489
    BMW 118d: 6 speed manual, 3.07.
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Tallinn, Estonia
    Posts
    2,863
    2006 Fiat Punto: 5 speed manual, 3.8:1

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    1978 matra Bagheera, 4 speed, 3.47
    1987 Quantum, 5 speed, 3.58
    1992 Alpine A610, 5 speed, 3.44
    1998 Suzuki Bandit, 5 speed, 3.2 equivalent
    2006 RX-8 PZ, 6 speed, 4.44

    Not sure about comparison tho' FLeet.
    I think it's fine when it's a smilar car and rev range -- ie large V8 and hence a popular statistic for you guys.

    But the cars above vary in rev range from the Bag at 5500 and the RX-8 at 9800 and so the final diff ration doesn't help in comparing those along with the actual gear ratios used. Equally some have a wide power band and some ( tuned Bagheera 'X' doesn't come on cam till nearly 4000 revs and has run out of air at 5500. The RX-8 is 2000-9800 usable or 4000-9800 performance

    However I've proivded the numbers for you to do with as you wish Cheers.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    San Fernando Valley, Calif.
    Posts
    6,794
    I just want to see the extremes... the lowest and highest ratios. So far it looks like 3.07 to 5.38.
    '76 Cadillac Fleetwood Seventy-Five Limousine, '95 Lincoln Town Car.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Auckland, NZ
    Posts
    1,189
    1999 Saab 9-5 SE, 4 speed automatic, and what do you mean by axle ratio? I only find these stats:

    Gear Ratio:
    1st - 3.67
    2nd - 2.10
    3rd - 1.39
    4th - 1.00
    Reverse - 4.02
    Final Drive Ratio - 2.56

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    6,065
    Quote Originally Posted by Fleet 500 View Post
    I just want to see the extremes... the lowest and highest ratios. So far it looks like 3.07 to 5.38.
    Btw,that 5.38 is a short autocross course only gear.
    "We went to Wnedy's. I had chicken nuggest." ~ Quiggs

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,328
    I really have no idea. It runs 1800 revs at 100 kph, which means it could theoryratically do 250 at 4500....which is where the rev limiter comes in.
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    San Fernando Valley, Calif.
    Posts
    6,794
    Quote Originally Posted by johnnynumfiv View Post
    Btw,that 5.38 is a short autocross course only gear.
    I have a Motor Trend test of 3 MG's and I actually know where it is.

    So here are some quick specs. None of them had super-low gearing, though, like yours.

    Motor Trend, Oct., 1971. (I assume they are 1972 models.)

    ------------------------ MGB-GT---------- MGB--------- MG Midget

    Engine------------------ 109-cu-in/1798 cc 109/1798---- 78/1275
    Horsepower/torque------- 92/110----------- 92/110------ 62/72
    Curb weight------------- 2,360 lbs--------- 2,240 lbs---- 1,635 lbs
    Axle ratio---------------- 3.91:1----------- 3.91:1------- 3.73:1
    Transmission------------- 4-speed manual-- 4-speed man- 4-speed man
    0-60 mph---------------- 12.8 secs-------- 13.1--------- 15.2
    1/4 mile------------------ [email protected] mph-- 19.3@74----- [email protected]
    Braking, 60-0 mph-------- 133 feet--------- 134 feet----- 134 feet
    Fuel mileage-------------- 25-28 mpg------ 25-28 mpg--- 25-30 mpg
    Speed in gears @ rpm--
    1st---------------------- 28.5@5500 rpm- 28.5@5500--- 29@5500
    2nd---------------------- 45@5500------- 45@5500----- 49.5@5500
    3rd---------------------- 70@5500------- 70@5500------ 69@5500
    4th---------------------- 96.2@5500----- 96.2@5500---- 96.2@5500
    '76 Cadillac Fleetwood Seventy-Five Limousine, '95 Lincoln Town Car.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    San Fernando Valley, Calif.
    Posts
    6,794
    Quote Originally Posted by Roentgen View Post
    1999 Saab 9-5 SE, 4 speed automatic, and what do you mean by axle ratio? I only find these stats:

    Gear Ratio:
    1st - 3.67
    2nd - 2.10
    3rd - 1.39
    4th - 1.00
    Reverse - 4.02
    Final Drive Ratio - 2.56
    That would be final drive ratio... axle/final drive ratio in other words.
    '76 Cadillac Fleetwood Seventy-Five Limousine, '95 Lincoln Town Car.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    6,065
    Quote Originally Posted by Fleet 500 View Post
    I have a Motor Trend test of 3 MG's and I actually know where it is.

    So here are some quick specs. None of them had super-low gearing, though, like yours.
    I believe this gear set was out of some type of delivery truck that was used in England, it used a midget rear flipped upside down.
    "We went to Wnedy's. I had chicken nuggest." ~ Quiggs

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Auckland, NZ
    Posts
    1,189
    Quote Originally Posted by Fleet 500 View Post
    That would be final drive ratio... axle/final drive ratio in other words.
    Ah ok, then my one is really low then? Is that a good thing or bad thing?

    Looks like I've created a new extreme :P

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    └A & Connecticlump
    Posts
    5,367
    Quote Originally Posted by Roentgen View Post
    1999 Saab 9-5 SE, 4 speed automatic, and what do you mean by axle ratio? I only find these stats:

    Gear Ratio:
    1st - 3.67
    2nd - 2.10
    3rd - 1.39
    4th - 1.00
    Reverse - 4.02
    Final Drive Ratio - 2.56
    Quote Originally Posted by Roentgen View Post
    Ah ok, then my one is really low then? Is that a good thing or bad thing?

    Looks like I've created a new extreme :P
    Your car seems to be geared like an old American car (it probably has an American transmission). The gear ratios themselves are pretty high but the final drive ratio is on the low side for low-rev cruising in top gear. Johnny or Fleet, did I get that right?

    For me:
    1998 Ford Escort (Dad's)
    5-speed manual
    3.85:1 (or 4.1:1?, but I think that is for the ZX2 only)

    1996 Toyota Camry (Mom's)
    4-speed auto
    3.43:1
    "Kimi, can you improve on your [race] finish?"
    "No. My Finnish is fine; I am from Finland. Do you have any water?"

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    San Fernando Valley, Calif.
    Posts
    6,794
    Quote Originally Posted by f6fhellcat13 View Post
    Your car seems to be geared like an old American car (it probably has an American transmission). The gear ratios themselves are pretty high but the final drive ratio is on the low side for low-rev cruising in top gear. Johnny or Fleet, did I get that right?

    For me:
    1998 Ford Escort (Dad's)
    5-speed manual
    3.85:1 (or 4.1:1?, but I think that is for the ZX2 only)

    1996 Toyota Camry (Mom's)
    4-speed auto
    3.43:1
    Yes, his (Roentgen's) car has a low (numerically high) 1st gear and a high (numerically low) final drive. So it all balances out... the low 1st gear helps acceleration and the high final drive keeps revs down when cruising.
    '76 Cadillac Fleetwood Seventy-Five Limousine, '95 Lincoln Town Car.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Land Rover e-Terrain Concept 2006
    By Matt in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-28-2006, 08:25 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •