I'd not put money on it.
Designing an F1 winning car isn't just about money.
Look at BMW investement in new aero designer and computer time and wind tunnel to produce a "better" front nose. Nobody else copied it - and you can be certain they'll have tested it. So BMW screwed up thinking money and computers made a difference.
There is another side to F1 and it's experience.
THAT is why Ferrari are still winning, yeah they thro shedloads f money - but so do others ( esp. if you take driver salary out of the equation ). Ferrari have knowledge thtat they use to evolve their designs. So they start 2005 with the 2004 car - NOT because they can't build a new car, becase they get the performance they need
Porsceh couldn't hope to do that for a number of years.
Don't see them squandering their $$$ from the Cayenne on F1 when they can sponsor the TV shows in the US and get as much exposure - and with NO risk of being last on the grid (Ford )
"A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'