Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 78

Thread: Prius Outdoes Hummer in Environmental Damage

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,328
    can we try to stay on topic for a change?
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,489
    Quote Originally Posted by drakkie View Post
    Quite mixed. I start off with a piece of 60 km/h then 80 for a while (total 15 km). When I turn onto the highway i stay on it for 40 km's then i turn of into the city with many traffic lights and a max. speed of 50 again.
    That's impressive. Getting just above 4l/100km in a petrol car in this kind of driving conditions is astonishing.
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    66
    That new EPA testing method sounds dumb. Why would the highway speed be higher than speed limits? Most highways around here are 55mph, at least near cities, and 65mph once you get aways out; 80 mph sounds a bit excessive. So does the 8mph/sec acceleration, which the prius can't do (at least average from 0-60). Other than that the article was interesting, but they failed to mention how the new testing affects the hummers and every other car out there. I thought it was unfair to act as though the prius is the only reason that nickel is mined, especially since nickel is used in chrome plating the obnoxious wheels and grills on the hummers they were comparing the prius to.
    Last note, is anyone really going to put 300k miles on their hummer? The majority of people I know upgrade after about 100k, but then again, 80% of statistics are made up on the spot.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    10,227
    Someone finally hit the nail on the head. My pal told me about this phenomenon earlier: the so called "green cars" and "green ways". I am all for the environment. In a perfect world, we wouldn't need cars at all and we would have much less pollution, etc etc - but we have to realize that we are all a little selfish.

    The point is, many so-called green methods are very dirty as well as the energy put into making them is very environmentally damaging - where does the energy to make the battery come from? A coal power plant. What it ultimately boild down to - and what those that are not scientific cannot see is where the route of the energy comes from. The nickel mine in Sudbury (Sudbury sucks btw and I have never been there) is only a fraction of the problem. I don't know the hard stats, but i'd bet that the energy expended to make a car like a Prius is much greater than that of say, a Kia. The point is, our primary energy sources are all dirty and this filters down to lower levels.
    So - the ultimate most important goal is for green powerplants - that would make green cars hopefully more feasible and we also need straight up as an entire race to conserve - but the question is is anyone of us really willing to cut back in our daily lives signifigantly to help the envieronment? Time will tell.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Location: Location: (UK)
    Posts
    2,496
    The 100k hummer won't just disappear, it'll get sold on to someone else.
    PPC - Put a V8 in it!

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    2,056
    Yay!! Eat That Tree Huggers!
    Gone:
    09 Ducati Monster 696
    09 Audi Q5 3.2
    03 Infiniti G35 Sedan
    07 Honda Civic Coupe LX 5spd

    Current:
    10 BMW 335d
    12 Audi Q5 2.0t
    10 VW Jetta TDI
    11 Ducati Monster 796

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Calgary AB
    Posts
    1,580
    Top Gear awarded the new S-class as the most enviromentally friendly car thanks to it's environmentally friendly production

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    2,056
    it also said the new 911 Turbo 997 is really clean. in LA it would put out cleaner air then it puts into its engine.
    Gone:
    09 Ducati Monster 696
    09 Audi Q5 3.2
    03 Infiniti G35 Sedan
    07 Honda Civic Coupe LX 5spd

    Current:
    10 BMW 335d
    12 Audi Q5 2.0t
    10 VW Jetta TDI
    11 Ducati Monster 796

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Detroit
    Posts
    2,176
    I have to admit, that is some real ownage towards Toyota. THey have been really pushing the Hybrid plate lately. I kinda do think as of lately that the Hybrids are over rated. They don't get their precieved milage, and a large sedan with a diesel engine can get their milage. Of course they will never be sold here in passenger cars though, we can thank Cadillac for that.
    I have found a new love in the form of a tristar.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    5,772
    As if people are just going to junk their Priuses after 100,000 miles.

    Still, simplicity and small diesels are the way to go for economical cars.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,489
    Quote Originally Posted by 092326001 View Post
    Top Gear awarded the new S-class as the most enviromentally friendly car thanks to it's environmentally friendly production
    No they didn't. What they did is say in the S-class film that some german organisation had said that as a package the S-class was more evironmentally friendly than the Toyota Prius.
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Eindhoven, The Netherlands
    Posts
    7,833
    Quote Originally Posted by Egg Nog View Post
    As if people are just going to junk their Priuses after 100,000 miles.
    Well I heard that the cost of replacing the batteries is half(!!) the new price. So with the depreciation on the car, it would make it uneconomical...

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Quote Originally Posted by Egg Nog View Post
    As if people are just going to junk their Priuses after 100,000 miles.
    Warranty runs out at 100L, so may be sensible to do so.
    IIRC the original batteries were "lab tested" to last 150K miles.
    Given the replacement cost and the difficulty of disposal fo the old ones I wouldn't want to be the owner when it came around !!!!
    Anyone seen any figures on real world usage now they've been aroudn for a while ??
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    5,772
    Quote Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine View Post
    Warranty runs out at 100L, so may be sensible to do so.
    IIRC the original batteries were "lab tested" to last 150K miles.
    Given the replacement cost and the difficulty of disposal fo the old ones I wouldn't want to be the owner when it came around !!!!
    Anyone seen any figures on real world usage now they've been aroudn for a while ??
    They use them as taxis here. Toyota bought one of them back at over 300,000kms so they could study it (and gave the cabby a free 2nd generation model). Now I doubt that's a typical figure, but still, not half bad.

    (Found a link - looks like there's one around here with over 400,000kms as well)

    http://www.hybridexperience.ca/Toyota_Prius.htm (Taxi information is near the bottom)

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Dichter&Denker-Country
    Posts
    110
    Quote Originally Posted by drakkie View Post
    By the way, my alto is greener than a Prius according to this ! I get 60-65 mpg in daily traffic with almost constant overdrive and almost no acceleration... Cruise control helps a lot too.
    you're driving a Suzi Alto? you must have to live a very poor and boring life...
    ...at least in terms of driving

    Quote Originally Posted by Kitdy View Post
    ...In a perfect world, we wouldn't need cars at all...
    that would be a very poor world, imagine it: no ferraris, no pagani zonda, no merc sl gullwing, no bugattis & Lambos and so on
    kitdy you make my eyes wet

    Quote Originally Posted by coolieman1220 View Post
    it also said the new 911 Turbo 997 is really clean. in LA it would put out cleaner air then it puts into its engine.
    i've never been in L.A. nor have i eve breathed the exhaust gas of the new turbo (or of any other car ) but i guess that was a joke

    Quote Originally Posted by Prius View Post
    ...Of course they will never be sold here in passenger cars though, we can thank Cadillac for that.
    why will hybrids never be sold in motown? and what's got cadillac to do with that?

    Quote Originally Posted by Egg Nog View Post
    They use them as taxis here. Toyota bought one of them back at over 300,000kms so they could study it (and gave the cabby a free 2nd generation model). Now I doubt that's a typical figure, but still, not half bad.

    (Found a link - looks like there's one around here with over 400,000kms as well)
    wouldn't surprise me if Toyota shifted the mileage-counter a bit

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Hummer H2 American Red Cross Emergency Response Vehicle
    By McLareN in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-06-2009, 01:02 AM
  2. Official: Hummer expands to Australia
    By lightweight in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 10-29-2006, 01:06 AM
  3. Hummer Humor
    By Prius in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-27-2005, 04:48 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •