Go to Ultimatecarpage.com

Go Back   Ultimatecarpage.com forums > Automotive forums > Car comparison


View Poll Results: M3 or 2.5 16v?
BMW E30 M3 Evo III 48 58.54%
Mercedes-Benz 190E 2.5 16v Evo II 34 41.46%
Voters: 82. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 06-12-2008, 10:06 AM
Ferrer's Avatar
Ferrer Ferrer is offline
Furniture
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 33,198
Barcelona
Send a message via MSN to Ferrer
Quote:
Originally Posted by superwaxer View Post
Rofl lmfao!! What does that have to do with them being concidered as equals?
Everything. Racing success is very important for a car's recognition.

Let's face it. Nobody remembers the Mazda 323 4WD. But everyone knows about the Delta HF Integrale.
__________________
Lack of charisma can be fatal.
Visca Catalunya!
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 06-12-2008, 10:18 AM
Rockefella's Avatar
Rockefella Rockefella is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 16,605
Northern New Jersey
Send a message via AIM to Rockefella Send a message via MSN to Rockefella
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferrer View Post
Everything. Racing success is very important for a car's recognition.

Let's face it. Nobody remembers the Mazda 323 4WD. But everyone knows about the Delta HF Integrale.
I would say somewhat rather than everything. Renault may have beat Ferrari in Formula 1 two years ago, but does that mean they make better sportscars? No. Obviously that example is inflated but track-racing specials from the homologated versions are similarly, 'inflated' versions of the cars.
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 06-12-2008, 10:27 AM
Ferrer's Avatar
Ferrer Ferrer is offline
Furniture
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 33,198
Barcelona
Send a message via MSN to Ferrer
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockefella View Post
I would say somewhat rather than everything. Renault may have beat Ferrari in Formula 1 two years ago, but does that mean they make better sportscars? No. Obviously that example is inflated but track-racing specials from the homologated versions are similarly, 'inflated' versions of the cars.
But people can relate to them therefore making recognition much easier. That's why the Impreza is so well known for such a small company.

And it was the problem companies like Lancia or Renault in the 70's when they rallied the Stratos and Alpines respectively. The problem was they didn't share anything visually with the cars on the showrooms so the success was hard to exploit for the marketing temas of each manufacturer.

So what Fiat decided to do was replace the Stratos supercar with a mundane 131 saloon.
__________________
Lack of charisma can be fatal.
Visca Catalunya!
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 06-12-2008, 03:45 PM
superwaxer's Avatar
superwaxer superwaxer is offline
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 255
New Zealand
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferrer View Post
Everything. Racing success is very important for a car's recognition.

Let's face it. Nobody remembers the Mazda 323 4WD. But everyone knows about the Delta HF Integrale.
No its got nothing to do with it! There is a huge difference between a production car and a race car.

Take the Australian V8 Supercars for example. The production Fords and the production Holdens have very different qualities and capabilities on the road. However, the V8 Supercars, or racecars, are equal in almost any form. They all share similar weight, power, brakes, rigidity, suspension characteristics etc.

Im not gonna buy the Holden instead of the Ford because Holden won Bathurst or something. I will individually test drive each of the standard production vehicles and base my decision on that.

The same goes for the 190E and the M3. Both great cars on the track (in race form), but very different in street form. And as I said before, unless Im incapable of reading, this thread is about the standard production cars, not about how they performed on the racetrack.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 06-12-2008, 04:19 PM
Ferrer's Avatar
Ferrer Ferrer is offline
Furniture
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 33,198
Barcelona
Send a message via MSN to Ferrer
Quote:
Originally Posted by superwaxer View Post
No its got nothing to do with it! There is a huge difference between a production car and a race car.

Take the Australian V8 Supercars for example. The production Fords and the production Holdens have very different qualities and capabilities on the road. However, the V8 Supercars, or racecars, are equal in almost any form. They all share similar weight, power, brakes, rigidity, suspension characteristics etc.

Im not gonna buy the Holden instead of the Ford because Holden won Bathurst or something. I will individually test drive each of the standard production vehicles and base my decision on that.

The same goes for the 190E and the M3. Both great cars on the track (in race form), but very different in street form. And as I said before, unless Im incapable of reading, this thread is about the standard production cars, not about how they performed on the racetrack.
I agree with all of that.

Problem is people don't care about it generally. Racing pedigree is important, especially with old cars, when it comes to image and reputation. There are other reasons like the fact that the M3 E30 was the start of a line while the 190E Cosworth wasn't (its successor technically the C36 AMG had little to do with it, even a different tuner and name).

As a result of all of that while the M3 may not be any better objectively than the Merc in people's minds it is. Which was my original point of why the road cars weren't being considered as equals today.
__________________
Lack of charisma can be fatal.
Visca Catalunya!
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 06-13-2008, 07:33 PM
Kooper's Avatar
Kooper Kooper is offline
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,350
Anyone have any specs on how which car performed in their respective tenures in DTM? I've looked but I couldn't find a great deal.

I'm curious to know which one won more DTM races for the period they were entered. Doesn't have anything to do with this comparison though, just plain good old curiosity.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 08-04-2008, 03:54 PM
F1sean16 F1sean16 is offline
Novice
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5
Indianapolis, IN U.S.A.
I really can't decide.....so BOTH!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 08-04-2008, 09:31 PM
kingofthering's Avatar
kingofthering kingofthering is offline
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,354
95616
Send a message via AIM to kingofthering
Quote:
Originally Posted by F1sean16 View Post
I really can't decide.....so BOTH!!!!!
About damn time somebody said that.
__________________
I'm dropping out to create a company that starts with motorcycles, then cars, and forty years later signs a legendary Brazilian driver who has a public and expensive feud with his French teammate.
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 10-28-2009, 01:08 PM
Manolo.E30M3 Manolo.E30M3 is offline
Novice
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1
Hi people, i came across this discussion and just for this, i had to register to this site. Below you can read what i found. Enjoy.
Oh and see my name, no question i'm going for the M3. (Currently I'm driving a 325i E30. The M3 would be the next step for me.)
Like i said, enjoy the article.


SOURCE:
firstdayoftherestofmylife: 190e 2.5 16v vs E30 M3...


Sunday, June 14, 2009
190e 2.5 16v vs E30 M3...
i found this really awesome article about a shootout between a 190e 2.5 16v and an E30 M3.

the article is superbly written, if a tad old-school, which is the way imho..i don't do enough posts about cars, so heres one, excerpted from the 1988 September issue of Car Magazine. i know you can't see the pics, so click on it and it'll enlarge. ladies and gentlemen, from an era without automotive shows and/or crazy japanese turbocharged cars, enjoy.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(From here you can first read the 5 page article from 1988)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

And that's the end of the article. the rivalry between these two great German marques continue however, with the later Evolution models which are mainly homologation specials, the E30 M3 Evo1, Evo2 and the E30 M3 Sports Evolution (S.E). In it's final culmination the E30 M3 S.E has 2.5 litres and was pushing 238 bhp at 7000 rpm.

And Mercedes Benz (then Daimler-Benz) countered with the 190E 2.5 16v Evolution (aka Evo1) which was pushing 195 bhp. after producing 502 of these, MB released the Evolution II model(my favourite car in the history of the world, pictured here), which was pushing 235 bhp.

of course, the improvements aren't just power hikes, from new electronics to revised aerodynamics, but it's too extensive for me to write here. you can get the information here

1990 Mercedes-Benz 190 E 2.5-16 Evolution II - Images, Specifications and Information
The BMW Club of Houston, Ltd..
Blast from the Past: BMW E30 M3 EVO vs Mercedes 190E 2.5 16v - Carscoop

the articles i got from Carscoop, i claim nothing, it is all theirs/his/hers. thx for letting me use the articles.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg page_1.jpg (160.2 KB, 7 views)
File Type: jpg page_2.jpg (251.3 KB, 6 views)
File Type: jpg page_3.jpg (243.8 KB, 2 views)
File Type: jpg page_4.jpg (228.3 KB, 3 views)
File Type: jpg page_5.jpg (228.5 KB, 2 views)

Last edited by Manolo.E30M3; 10-28-2009 at 01:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 11-17-2009, 04:31 AM
ntstone's Avatar
ntstone ntstone is offline
Novice
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1
beijing
love E30 very much ,love M3 forever
Reply With Quote
  #71  
Old 02-04-2010, 04:54 AM
Beckerman's Avatar
Beckerman Beckerman is offline
Novice
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6
London
I lusted after both in my teens. The Merc was less well known in the UK which had its own attraction but it was hugely expensive, not sure about the Evo but the steering is too low geared in the 2.3. In performance terms the 2.5 engine in the 190 closed the gap to the M3 just at the point when the M3 2.5 Evolution was introduced. 20 years down the line the 190 doesn't have the appeal it once had whereas the M3 is still a car you would want to add to your dream garage. Unfortunately late M3 Evolutions are now being advertised for over £30k here in the UK which is pretty much double the price they were fetching 3-4 years ago.
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 02-04-2010, 10:44 PM
iwmakemh's Avatar
iwmakemh iwmakemh is offline
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 197
Where drug dealers and asian stores are born, California
I'm sorry bimmer guys I'll take the Mercedes any time, in my opinion I will give it thumbs up for having four doors!
__________________
“Speed has never killed anyone, suddenly becoming stationary... that’s what gets you.”
-Jeremy Clarkson
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 04-30-2010, 03:05 PM
group c n b man's Avatar
group c n b man group c n b man is offline
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 136
The BMW M3. It looks brilliant and it was spawned thanks to a great racing car. It's a true classic now just like the Sierra Cosworth it raced against more than 20 years ago.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
bmw, mercedes


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Really useful performance listings... Egg Nog Technical forums 58 06-20-2013 10:45 PM
What BMW means?? Swissbeatz Miscellaneous 59 09-24-2007 03:58 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:24 AM.

 

© 1998 - 2019 Ultimatecarpage.com