Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22

Thread: Porsche Type 64 Aerocoupe 1939

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Tallinn, Estonia
    Posts
    2,863

    Porsche Type 64 Aerocoupe 1939

    The Volkswagen Type 64 (a.k.a Type 64K10) racing car was built in 1938/39 for the long-distance Berlin-Rome race. Based on the Volkswagen Type 60, the Type 64 was seen as the ideal model for promoting sales of the "People's Car".

    The body design was made by the Porsche Büro after wind tunnel tests for a planned V10 sports car that never came into existence, the Type 114. By 1939 Ferdinard Porsche had completed three racing coupés boasting a streamlined hand shaped aluminium body built by Reutter and powered by a modified VW flat-4 but then the Berlin-Rome Race planned for September 1939 was postponed due to the War.

    Early in the War one built example was crashed by a KdF (Volkswagen) bureaucrat. The two remaining were used by the Porsche family. Eventually they only used one of them and put the other in storage. In May 1945 American troops discovered the one put in storage, cut the roof off and used it for joyriding for a few weeks until the engine gave up and it was scrapped. The last remaining Type 64 was owned by Ferry Porsche who had it restored by Pinin Farina in 1947. In 1949 it was sold to the Austrian motorcycle racer Otto Matte and with it he won the Alpine Rally in 1950. The last time he drove it in a race was at the Monterey Historic Races in Monterey, California, in 1982.

    Type 64 is acknowledged by many as the original ancestor of all subsequent sports cars to follow from Porsche in the years and decades to come.

    Sources: PR "75 Years of Porsche Engineering Services", wikipedia.org

    Edit: Porsche afficionados would call this first Porsche ever, Porsche Type 64
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by Revo; 05-03-2006 at 12:48 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    436
    Known as the "Porsche 64" to me, porbably that is just the design.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,489
    Quote Originally Posted by carweb
    Known as the "Porsche 64" to me, porbably that is just the design.
    I also knew it as a Porsche, though as it was using Volkswagen mechanicals and the project was for Volkswagen, it could be considered as VW.
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Germany -> West Germany -> NRW -> Düsseldorf
    Posts
    3,006
    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrer
    I also knew it as a Porsche, though as it was using Volkswagen mechanicals and the project was for Volkswagen, it could be considered as VW.
    No! VW exists since 1938, but this car wasn't built by VW but by Ferdinand Porsche. So you have to call it a Porsche in my eyes.

    I know, that F.Porsche also designed and engineered the Beetle up to production, but that was a real VW project (although it was called the "KdF-Wagen" before they invented "Volkswagen").
    WRC - That's motorsport!

    "If you can see the tree you are about to hit, it is called 'understeering'. If you can only hear and feel it, it was 'oversteering'."
    Walter Röhrl

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,489
    Quote Originally Posted by netburner
    No! VW exists since 1938, but this car wasn't built by VW but by Ferdinand Porsche. So you have to call it a Porsche in my eyes.

    I know, that F.Porsche also designed and engineered the Beetle up to production, but that was a real VW project (although it was called the "KdF-Wagen" before they invented "Volkswagen").
    Well in the post with the car's history it says that it was built in 1938/1939, so Volkswagen was exisiting when this car was bieng built. And what's more I said that the car was done for Volkswagen, not by Volkswagen. Even if it wasn't called Volkswagen by then, the project was to promote what eventually would became Volkswagen. And another reason to assume that Volkswagen existed, was that it used Volkswagen mechanicals.

    Porsche and their engineering consultancy have done vehicles that didn't carry its name, and they didn't become Porsches just because he desgined/engineered them (the Cisitalia Grand Prix racer springs to my mind).
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Tallinn, Estonia
    Posts
    2,863
    Netburner, I think you are right and I've put wrong title on the thread

    Till tonight I thought Porsche AG was founded after WW2 and first car to bear Porsche name was 356. As it turns out, I am completely ignorant.

    Porsche AG was founded in 1931. The first car built by Porsche AG was this Type 64, the second Porsche model and first car sold by Porsche was 356.

    Mods, can you change the title of this thread?

    Yeah, just loving when learning new stuff about automotive history.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Delft
    Posts
    4,488
    The first real Porsche
    Attached Images Attached Images

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Posts: 30,245
    Posts
    7,352
    it looks like its been hammered to shape

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Eindhoven, The Netherlands
    Posts
    7,833
    Quote Originally Posted by Cotterik
    it looks like its been hammered to shape
    Almost all low-production-run cars were in these days

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    95616
    Posts
    5,357
    it's nice, but what happened to it?
    I'm dropping out to create a company that starts with motorcycles, then cars, and forty years later signs a legendary Brazilian driver who has a public and expensive feud with his French teammate.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,489
    There is talk that this wasn't actually a mistake.

    Also, for all the media coverage the car got the weeks prior to the auction, they apparently forgot to tell the car's true story (Nazi origins and whatnot).
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    East Coast of the United States
    Posts
    12,007
    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrer View Post
    There is talk that this wasn't actually a mistake.

    Also, for all the media coverage the car got the weeks prior to the auction, they apparently forgot to tell the car's true story (Nazi origins and whatnot).
    You'd have to be incredibly dense if you bought a German car from the late 1930s and didn't know it had Nazi connections, especially if you're rich enough to be interested a car this expensive.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,489
    Well the thing is, this was created specifically for the stillborn 1939 Berlin to Rome race, to celebrate the alliance of Italy and Germany and demonstrate the superiority of the Aryan race.

    So while all 1930's German cars are Nazis, some are more Nazi than others...
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    East Coast of the United States
    Posts
    12,007
    I get that, but I don't understand why people get their panties in a knot once something has a bad connotation. I mean, couldn't we just appreciate something for what it is- an exemplary specimen of engineering? The fact that it was built during the Nazi regime is regrettable, but you can't deny the engineering prowess behind it.

    I feel like these days everything is unnecessarily politicized. Not everything needs to be politicized, however.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    └A & Connecticlump
    Posts
    5,367
    Quote Originally Posted by NSXType-R View Post
    I get that, but I don't understand why people get their panties in a knot once something has a bad connotation. I mean, couldn't we just appreciate something for what it is- an exemplary specimen of engineering? The fact that it was built during the Nazi regime is regrettable, but you can't deny the engineering prowess behind it.

    I feel like these days everything is unnecessarily politicized. Not everything needs to be politicized, however.
    I can't say I know much of the provenance of this car, so let me make a straw man, but can you see why some might not want to have one of the Silver Arrows that was built by slave labor in their collection? The Auto Union with the Star of David scratched into the carburetor springs hauntingly to mind. I certainly wouldn't want to own such a thing.
    "Kimi, can you improve on your [race] finish?"
    "No. My Finnish is fine; I am from Finland. Do you have any water?"

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Really useful performance listings...
    By Egg Nog in forum Technical forums
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 04-18-2021, 05:13 PM
  2. Porsche 981c Cayman GT4 2015-2016
    By Duell in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 10-11-2015, 01:45 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-07-2015, 10:50 AM
  4. Porsche 997 911 Carrera (All Models) 2004-2011
    By Matt in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 135
    Last Post: 10-25-2011, 06:17 PM
  5. Porsche Typ 597 "Jagdwagen" - the Cayenne's ancestor
    By Delmaster in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-06-2009, 08:21 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •