View Poll Results: How do you feel about current car design trends? (Especially sports cars)

Voters
89. You may not vote on this poll
  • Bigger is better, regardless of weight/efficiency. As long as there is more power.

    10 11.24%
  • I miss the old days of sports car design. Gimme a Lotus Elise anyday

    61 68.54%
  • I don't particularly care, as long as cars still work.

    10 11.24%
  • Yo. My Cavalier is tHa best/fastest caR evAr.

    8 8.99%
Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 93

Thread: The demise of small cars...

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    B.C Canada
    Posts
    391
    I'll concede that point. There is plenty of fun to be had throwing tons of power around. But, Ferrari and Lambo are not sports cars. They are dream machines and for an average joe like me with a poor job I'll never afford one. A sports car must be small and built for the joy of a twisting mountain road. Not a $200 000 engine with a fancy frame and leather seats they are in a leauge of their own. So really this post needs to define what a "sports car" really is. Hint Hint Egg Nog
    "If you feel like you're in control you're not going fast enough" - Mario Andretti

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    6,153
    Yes this post needs to define what "its" definition of a sports car is. Excluding Lambos and Furries because they dont adhere to your criteria does not mean they are not sports cars. Lets have a definition from an authoratative source. No offence intended.
    "A string is approximately nine long."
    Egg Nogg 02-04-2005, 05:07 AM

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    B.C Canada
    Posts
    391
    None Taken.
    "If you feel like you're in control you're not going fast enough" - Mario Andretti

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    boostone mass
    Posts
    498
    i think a sports car should excell in ALL areas of performance. Is that wrong? Something that handles well, has a good amount of power, and at the end of the day is still able to drive home on its own power. I love small sportscars but they seem to be hideously underpowered. There's nothing wrong with sacrificing 100 lbs to gain vast horsepower and more torgue. Therein lies my problem with lotus. Great cars, but not much oomph. I loved the exige but they discontinued it.

    Also, have you ever seen a lotus europa? How can you say it's a real sports car? It's made for midgets or something. I swear i could fit it in the back of my CIVIC as an escape pod. And with a whopping 60 hp you better hope there's no one in the passenger side and your golf clubs aren't in the back (assuming they fit), otherwise good luck getting up that hill.

    I once heard a qoute that said something like the 1960-70s were a bleak era for cars, your options were either straight line muscle cars or british sportsters that couldn't outrun the family wagon that didn't even know it was racing.

    there's nothing wrong with small cars, but a larger car allows for more creature comforts that people want. That elise is nice, but does it have ac? I bet the corvette does. I'll stick to dreaming of the 360 modena before i go for the toyota MR2. I can't afford either, so why not go big?
    And Iraaaaaaaaaaaan

    Iran's so far awaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay...

    ROR

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    6,153
    I have posted this pic many times but it says it all. Too big, too powerful too ugly. Perfect.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    "A string is approximately nine long."
    Egg Nogg 02-04-2005, 05:07 AM

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    1,336
    the scary part is it weighs just 1200lbs... when i look at that car i think motorcycle in car form, its power to weight is probly better than most motorcycles
    UCP's Most Hardcore Burro!

    Being human explains everything but excuses nothing

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    are you sure its that light, i dont think even F1's are 1200lbs
    I am the Stig

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,328
    Quote Originally Posted by fpv_gtho
    are you sure its that light, i dont think even F1's are 1200lbs

    I think he meant 1200 kg's. Time for the Ango Saxon world to go metric isn't it, to avoid further confusion.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    1200kg sounds more like it, but thats still featherweight in supercar territory, i think the SLR tipps the scales at over 1600kg
    I am the Stig

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,328
    Quote Originally Posted by fpv_gtho
    1200kg sounds more like it, but thats still featherweight in supercar territory, i think the SLR tipps the scales at over 1600kg
    but that's equipped with all sorts of comfort oriented devices which the TVR is most likely lacking.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Sible Hedingham, Essex, United Kingdom
    Posts
    3,214
    The world of small, fast, light, powerful cars is still around! Its just now you have to build your own!
    The K1 Attack has up to 400 bhp and weights 850kg!
    The GTM Libra and Spyder weights 700kg and has up to 210bhp!
    The Marlin 5EXI....well i dont actually know the spec for this but i sure does look good (well maybe they are not the greatest colours so you'll have to trust me on this that it can look good.)!
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by Suka; 01-25-2004 at 05:00 AM.
    Just call me Tom

    Please visit www.tomranson.com and make me feel loved.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    and don't forget the fastest of them ....

    RADICAL S3.
    1300cc bike engine, 510Kg
    490kg in race spec.

    "a road-legal* SR3 Tracksport has lapped the BBC's Top Gear test circuit in 1 minute 15 seconds, eight seconds faster than it's nearest rival, the Pagani Zonda. The same car lapped EVO magazine's test track in the wet, 11 seconds faster than a Porsche GT3's dry lap time."

    I want one for the track


  13. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,328

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Hamilton Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,860
    Quote Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine
    I want one for the track
    I would want one for the track too, but not for the street ... no room for a 500kg car in a world full of 2200kg SUVs. I think the safest place for racecars is on racetracks, at least until they cap the weight of passenger vehicles to level the playing field.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Quote Originally Posted by NoOne
    I would want one for the track too, but not for the street ... no room for a 500kg car in a world full of 2200kg SUVs. I think the safest place for racecars is on racetracks, at least until they cap the weight of passenger vehicles to level the playing field.
    yep, it's starting to get that way over here too.
    Plenty of light cars around with smart deformation construction to preotect passengeres and then introduce a few US/Japanese TANKS and they're mass makes intelligent engineering a waste of time

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Rice burners
    By cobrapower in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 392
    Last Post: 08-26-2006, 08:55 PM
  2. some cars are controversial and are simply beautiful
    By cro in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 06-14-2006, 03:15 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •