Wait 'til 2011.Originally Posted by clutch-monkey
Wait 'til 2011.Originally Posted by clutch-monkey
The Ace of All Aces.
Crysis. Maximum Game.
I thought the water was injected into the exiting airflow which created a bigger force.
And the puffer jets seem to be what i was talking about, wouldnt that have made sense as the idea of the harriers movarability would have remained???
At least at the back would be controlled overstear in the air
TVR, Heres to Peter wheeler and his last creationg of the Scamander.
Coventry seriously sucks....
Looks amazing!
yeah it kinda works like that too.Originally Posted by matek
By cooling the engine charge it allows the engine to burn more fuel thus more thrust.
So you can avoid overheating by reducing the throttle but as the purpose of the hover is to try to stay up then reducing thrust means meeting the ground.
Cause and effect ... in this case you can chose which one you want to be cause and which one effect
The puffer jets introduce limitation to the airframe and AFAIK the JSF uses vectored thrust on both engines ( the lift and the main nozzle ) to achieve the same.And the puffer jets seem to be what i was talking about, wouldnt that have made sense as the idea of the harriers movarability would have remained???
It's going to be fun once they start extending the flight envelope durign the tests to see what maneouvres they can coem up with It was the US Marines who showed the RAF about VIFFing IN_FLIGHT. We'd only used it for take off adn hover, NOT as an evasive optoinAt least at the back would be controlled overstear in the air
"A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'
I'm going in...Originally Posted by NuclearCrap
Any one want to do a thread on the YF-23 now thats a cool looking plane
TVR, Heres to Peter wheeler and his last creationg of the Scamander.
Coventry seriously sucks....
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)