Go to Ultimatecarpage.com

Go Back   Ultimatecarpage.com forums > Automotive forums > Racing forums


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-15-2009, 06:46 PM
lightweight's Avatar
lightweight lightweight is offline
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,163
Scotland, UK
2010 "Lotus" F1 Rear Suspension

The latest incarnation of what used to be Team Lotus, has revealed next year's F1 contender

Let me comment beforehand, that this team Lotus has no affiliation with the historic team. Today's owners, a partnership between the Malaysian Government and a consortium of Malaysian entrepreneurs, have just bought the brand name from its previous owner.

Most of the members would have already seen the photos

Lotus F1 Car Photo

The reason I am posting this is for the design of the rear wishbones. The wishbones are mounted in such a way, that the wheelbase will be different as the suspension moves up/down.

Has this happened in any other F1 cars in the past?
__________________
Minimising losses can maximise net gains
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-15-2009, 07:19 PM
johnnynumfiv's Avatar
johnnynumfiv johnnynumfiv is offline
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,068
Connecticut, USA
Send a message via AIM to johnnynumfiv Send a message via MSN to johnnynumfiv
I think you'd have to see the exact mounting points to see how it'd function. You can't really see how far forward the front of the wishbones are mounted.
__________________
"We went to Wnedy's. I had chicken nuggest." ~ Quiggs
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-15-2009, 11:03 PM
W.R.'s Avatar
W.R. W.R. is offline
Rookie
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 370
Near the middle of the middle of middle England.
I feel an appeal from other teams coming on.
__________________
Buying a car and not driving it is like buying a meal and not eating it.

"Oh sh*t, we're going..25!!" - A dear friend of mine.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-16-2009, 02:02 AM
TheScrutineer's Avatar
TheScrutineer TheScrutineer is offline
Rookie
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 223
Devon, England
As said, its difficult to make judgements without close up pictures to see how they are mounted. The rear of the wishbone is indeed at an angle rather than striaight with the car. I am not sure how this would affect the car without seeing how it is mounted.

It is important to remember that the suspension travel is extremely minimal, so any change in rear wheelbase from such a system would be tiny. In any case I can't see how the driveshafts would be able to 'flex' to size.

Can't remember seeing a car having is suspension like this, but I may be wrong.

Last edited by TheScrutineer; 10-16-2009 at 02:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-16-2009, 02:40 AM
Suka's Avatar
Suka Suka is offline
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,214
Sible Hedingham, Essex, United Kingdom
Send a message via MSN to Suka
I would like to point out that this is a wind tunnel test car. It's not by any means a functional design since Lotus have said they expect to reveal their actual car mid February.
__________________
Just call me Tom

Please visit www.tomranson.com and make me feel loved.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-16-2009, 02:41 AM
Matra et Alpine's Avatar
Matra et Alpine Matra et Alpine is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 27,781
nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
Nothing of real interest at Lotus F1 Racing

Intersting as by movign the mounting points, they've really cleaned up airflow to the rear and the wing.
Also, it's goign to be heavily debated as to whether it's a movable aerodynamic device with the angle of attach it present s to the airflow

As already stated, without seeing where it mounts and the rest of it, it's impossible to say what it does. Concur with the comment though that movement in F1 is so little that it's fairly academic -- does suggest it will hav increased camber on compression which is good.

Re the driveshafts coping, they already cope with the movement up and down, so a similar amount back to front would be managed. But can see no benefit to the handling and only problems for the driver
__________________
"A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

Last edited by Matra et Alpine; 10-16-2009 at 02:44 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-16-2009, 04:57 AM
lightweight's Avatar
lightweight lightweight is offline
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,163
Scotland, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine View Post
But can see no benefit to the handling and only problems for the driver
I would have thought (having no technical background on the topic) that the increased length of the wishbones would offer an improvement in handling. But the supposed altering wheelbase would result in handling compromises
__________________
Minimising losses can maximise net gains
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-16-2009, 05:47 AM
Matra et Alpine's Avatar
Matra et Alpine Matra et Alpine is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 27,781
nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
Quote:
Originally Posted by lightweight View Post
the increased length of the wishbones would offer an improvement in handling.
I was on the variable wheelbase issue.
Re the length iself, it's a compromise. Longer usually means less angular change and the benefit you identify, BUT at the cost of more weight to make them strong enough and less rigidty and packagng difficulties.
Quote:
But the supposed altering wheelbase would result in handling compromises
Anything that alters the geometry of a race car is n issue. Each time it moves the driver has to adjust their line/hrottle/braking. Look at the mes KERS has caused
__________________
"A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

Last edited by Matra et Alpine; 10-16-2009 at 06:10 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-16-2009, 03:22 AM
LeonOfTheDead's Avatar
LeonOfTheDead LeonOfTheDead is offline
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,826
Modena
Quote:
Originally Posted by lightweight View Post
Let me comment beforehand, that this team Lotus has no affiliation with the historic team. Today's owners, a partnership between the Malaysian Government and a consortium of Malaysian entrepreneurs, have just bought the brand name from its previous owner.
Actually, as the Malaysian Givernment (trough Proton) owns the Group Lotus Plc, the are much more related to the original Lotus team than the guy, David Hunt, who owns the "Team Lotus" brand name.

Indeed the are called "Lotus F1 Racing".
You may be confusing them with the ex-F3 English team Litespeed who applied the first time to enter F1 using the "Team Lotus" name. At that time, Group Lotus plc officially distanced themselves from the new team, something that this time isn' happening at all, as they actually are Lotus.
To be precise, they own Lotus, as the only point of Lotus to be involved in the new team is Mike Gascoigne.
__________________
KFL Racing Enterprises - Kicking your ass since 2008

*cough* http://theitalianjunkyard.blogspot.com/ *cough*
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-16-2009, 03:53 AM
Suka's Avatar
Suka Suka is offline
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,214
Sible Hedingham, Essex, United Kingdom
Send a message via MSN to Suka
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeonOfTheDead View Post
Actually, as the Malaysian Givernment (trough Proton) owns the Group Lotus Plc, the are much more related to the original Lotus team than the guy, David Hunt, who owns the "Team Lotus" brand name.

Indeed the are called "Lotus F1 Racing".
You may be confusing them with the ex-F3 English team Litespeed who applied the first time to enter F1 using the "Team Lotus" name. At that time, Group Lotus plc officially distanced themselves from the new team, something that this time isn' happening at all, as they actually are Lotus.
To be precise, they own Lotus, as the only point of Lotus to be involved in the new team is Mike Gascoigne.
Plus of course the current development is happening in sunny Norfolk although it will be moved to a purpose built facility at the Malaysian circuit at a later date.
__________________
Just call me Tom

Please visit www.tomranson.com and make me feel loved.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-17-2009, 01:31 PM
TheScrutineer's Avatar
TheScrutineer TheScrutineer is offline
Rookie
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 223
Devon, England
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suka View Post
Plus of course the current development is happening in sunny Norfolk although it will be moved to a purpose built facility at the Malaysian circuit at a later date.
All the development will be Malaysia. Nothing will come from Norfolk which is a real shame. There is nothing Lotus about this team and it is pretty sad to see the Lotus banner being used for a pretty much all Malaysian outfit with no racing pedigree. Should be Proton F1, but you can't fool anyone into buying those crappy cars.

Only thing I like about this team so far is Mike Gascoigne.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-17-2009, 05:55 PM
LeonOfTheDead's Avatar
LeonOfTheDead LeonOfTheDead is offline
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,826
Modena
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScrutineer View Post
Only thing I like about this team so far is Mike Gascoigne.
Which is from Lotus
__________________
KFL Racing Enterprises - Kicking your ass since 2008

*cough* http://theitalianjunkyard.blogspot.com/ *cough*
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-16-2009, 04:55 AM
lightweight's Avatar
lightweight lightweight is offline
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,163
Scotland, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeonOfTheDead View Post
You may be confusing them with the ex-F3 English team Litespeed who applied the first time to enter F1 using the "Team Lotus" name. At that time, Group Lotus plc officially distanced themselves from the new team, something that this time isn' happening at all, as they actually are Lotus.
To be precise, they own Lotus, as the only point of Lotus to be involved in the new team is Mike Gascoigne.
Hmmm, you are probably right.
__________________
Minimising losses can maximise net gains
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-16-2009, 04:58 AM
LeonOfTheDead's Avatar
LeonOfTheDead LeonOfTheDead is offline
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,826
Modena
Quote:
Originally Posted by lightweight View Post
Hmmm, you are probably right.
Don't worry, I was confused as well at first.
__________________
KFL Racing Enterprises - Kicking your ass since 2008

*cough* http://theitalianjunkyard.blogspot.com/ *cough*
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-16-2009, 04:17 AM
faksta's Avatar
faksta faksta is offline
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,546
Moscow, Russia
Send a message via MSN to faksta
Some time ago I have found a painted scale model of next year's Lotus, but now lost the link. It was painted in Malaysian flag colors mostly, as far as I remember. Did anyone succeed to stumble upon it as well?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
2010, formula 1, lotus, rear suspension


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
****ing McLaren F1 milad_ferrari General Automotive 85 10-02-2010 01:11 AM
The Next McLaren F1? Equinox General Automotive 25 04-07-2009 11:07 AM
Renault (F1-2008) R28 Sledgehammer Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out 14 08-20-2008 04:31 PM
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX Wagon GT McLareN Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out 32 01-14-2006 06:22 PM
No more playing games: Territory finally launched fpv_gtho General Automotive 113 05-24-2004 04:02 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:45 PM.

 

1998 - 2019 Ultimatecarpage.com