Go to Ultimatecarpage.com

Go Back   Ultimatecarpage.com forums > Automotive forums > General Automotive


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 42 votes, 3.31 average. Display Modes
  #16  
Old 08-13-2011, 01:58 PM
Dino Scuderia's Avatar
Dino Scuderia Dino Scuderia is offline
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,584
Southeast US
Quote:
Originally Posted by culver View Post
I've wondered about the back story there. Certainly when the development was under way it was known the chassis would be used for both cars. Did Chrysler do some, none, most, etc of the work?
"According to Inside Line, Dodge was indeed working on a new Viper when then corporate partner Daimler got involved in the project to use it to co-develop the SLS. Later, the Viper side of the development was dropped when Chrysler got into financial trouble.

Dodge engineers got as far as building an aluminum chassis for the model as well as creating a new suspension."
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-13-2011, 02:02 PM
Revo's Avatar
Revo Revo is offline
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,711
Tallinn, Estonia
Quote:
Originally Posted by NSXType-R View Post
Which ones then? Are they European only?
Here is a quick list of relatively cheap modern cars that I fancy.

Peugeot 508
Fiat 500 Twinair
Citroen DS3
VW Scirocco
Honda CRZ
Renault Laguna Coupe
Cadillac CTS
AR Giulietta
Chrysler 300
Peugeot RCZ
Audi A5 Sportback
Fiat Punto Evo Abarth
Ford Fiesta
Renault Twingo RS
Citroen DS5
Ford Mustang
VW Golf GTI
Opel Insignia
Mazda MX5
Audi A1
Mini
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-13-2011, 02:45 PM
RacingManiac's Avatar
RacingManiac RacingManiac is offline
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,457
Quote:
Originally Posted by NSXType-R View Post
Which ones then? Are they European only?

There are a few I am interested around $30,000, but only a few.

Man you are way too picky, under $30k we are not exactly lacking choice, family car, sporty, or otherwise....
__________________
University of Toronto Formula SAE Alumni 2003-2007
Formula Student Championship 2003, 2005, 2006
www.fsae.utoronto.ca
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-13-2011, 04:16 PM
Dino Scuderia's Avatar
Dino Scuderia Dino Scuderia is offline
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,584
Southeast US
Quote:
One problem I see is corn subsidies. We all know it doesn't work now, so why are we still siphoning off valuable tax dollars for something we know won't work?

The excuse is that to win Iowa in the elections is to appease all the hick corn growers. It's time to put politics aside and put the country first, a lot like a billion other problems the US has.
Subsidy ends 12/31/11 after far far too long.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-13-2011, 05:18 PM
Ferrer's Avatar
Ferrer Ferrer is offline
Furniture
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 33,277
Barcelona
Send a message via MSN to Ferrer
Jetta/Golf, Astra/Cruze and Civic are clear examples why the world car principle doesn't work. Also, I can think of at least two recent(ish) that didn't work either, the Palio and the original Mondeo.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Revo View Post
Here is a quick list of relatively cheap modern cars that I fancy.

Peugeot 508
Fiat 500 Twinair
Citroen DS3
VW Scirocco
Honda CRZ
Renault Laguna Coupe
Cadillac CTS
AR Giulietta
Chrysler 300
Peugeot RCZ
Audi A5 Sportback
Fiat Punto Evo Abarth
Ford Fiesta
Renault Twingo RS
Citroen DS5
Ford Mustang
VW Golf GTI
Opel Insignia
Mazda MX5
Audi A1
Mini
I disagree on the 508, the Audis and the Fiesta. The CTS and 300 clearly aren't 30 grand cars, and the Mustang wouldn't be if it came under Ford's oficial wing (see Camaro, which is going on sale next month...).
__________________
Lack of charisma can be fatal.
Visca Catalunya!
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 08-13-2011, 05:36 PM
Kitdy's Avatar
Kitdy Kitdy is offline
Furniture
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 10,075
VW does not seem to be embracing the world car idea at all. They are diverging from it. They have cars meant for Europe, NA, SA, and Asia as I understand it.

I think maybe a world car is not a bad idea, as long as you tweak things like engines, suspension, interior, for each specific market, which is what is being done.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-13-2011, 06:55 PM
Ferrer's Avatar
Ferrer Ferrer is offline
Furniture
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 33,277
Barcelona
Send a message via MSN to Ferrer
But if you tweak things like engines, suspension, interior, for each specific market, isn't that pretty much designing a new car for each market?
__________________
Lack of charisma can be fatal.
Visca Catalunya!
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-13-2011, 07:45 PM
RacingManiac's Avatar
RacingManiac RacingManiac is offline
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,457
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferrer View Post
But if you tweak things like engines, suspension, interior, for each specific market, isn't that pretty much designing a new car for each market?

Its all in the platform, the "same car" is just what can be built on the same line. Toyota/Honda et al have been doing this for years. In that pretty much all Toyota plant can build any Toyota in the world, something that GM cannot, at least they can't before. Specific tuning exists even for a particular car in the same market anyway, a car with "sports" suspension will have different parts to a normal one, but they are still the same car. The most expensive thing for a car in most cases is the tooling for stamping metal, by being able to share those, doing 1 engineering process instead of 5-6, you are saving a TON of money....
__________________
University of Toronto Formula SAE Alumni 2003-2007
Formula Student Championship 2003, 2005, 2006
www.fsae.utoronto.ca
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-14-2011, 01:21 AM
Ferrer's Avatar
Ferrer Ferrer is offline
Furniture
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 33,277
Barcelona
Send a message via MSN to Ferrer
But then again, Toyota and Honda have different cars for different markets. How many parts do the EDM and USDM Accord share? Or the EDM and the USDM Civic? Or the Camry and the Avensis? Or the Corolla and the Auris?
__________________
Lack of charisma can be fatal.
Visca Catalunya!
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-14-2011, 02:13 AM
Matra et Alpine's Avatar
Matra et Alpine Matra et Alpine is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 27,781
nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
WIth the Honda I think the problem was they had to make the Accord BIGGER to compete in the US. So started the "split" and the US had a car based on an older larger car chassis. Swindon added a European styling and suspension spring/damper but not really much else. So shared all the costs.
The major cost for cars is at the design phase. Billions of dolllars will be spent to develop the safety cell and suspension. A steel stamper for a body panel will cost 100K and amortized over 100s of thousands of cars. So we see some markets use "older" designs because they are known to work.
If you have a factory in a region there is no real benefit in sharing after the design/test phase as eg a stamper can be machined in a local supplier, so can add local differences. Same with plastics suppliers in the main.
Especially now with the cost of transport an issue local supply can be a greater advantage.
So I see a difference between a "world car" design and chassis and the final car.
__________________
"A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 08-14-2011, 05:56 AM
NSXType-R's Avatar
NSXType-R NSXType-R is offline
Furniture
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 11,617
East Coast of the United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by Revo View Post
Here is a quick list of relatively cheap modern cars that I fancy.

Peugeot 508
Fiat 500 Twinair
Citroen DS3
VW Scirocco
Honda CRZ
Renault Laguna Coupe
Cadillac CTS
AR Giulietta
Chrysler 300
Peugeot RCZ
Audi A5 Sportback
Fiat Punto Evo Abarth
Ford Fiesta
Renault Twingo RS
Citroen DS5
Ford Mustang
VW Golf GTI
Opel Insignia
Mazda MX5
Audi A1
Mini
That's not a bad selection, but at least 11 of those cars are not available in the US market.

Coupes are out of the question for me- not enough room = definitely not a CR-Z.

The CTS I don't like too much, ditto for the Chrysler 300.

The one car that might be perfect for me would be a TSX wagon. Starts at $30,960.

Edit-

A Subaru Impreza WRX might be reasonable for $30K.

Actually, you can't get a STI for 30K anymore...

Mazdaspeed 3 and Miata are both under 30K, but no 2 doors for me.

Last edited by NSXType-R; 08-14-2011 at 06:03 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 08-14-2011, 08:21 AM
RacingManiac's Avatar
RacingManiac RacingManiac is offline
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,457
MS3 is a 5 door only, and its a decent size car....

Mitsubishi Ralliart Sportsback is a 5 door car also. GTI/Golf/TDI is also a car in that class.

Curious though, why do you need the room?

Ferrer as Matra said, much of the cost is in the R&D phase, much of the stuff, just because the car may look different, it does not mean that they are different. Suspension components stamping, casting mold, brake system , backbond/subframe tooling, all those are being shared by various model in these cars designed for all the market. The key for an OEM to do when they started out to do this process of unifying their design, is to get all the differing standard around, and build one out of those, one that will satisfy the basic criteria in required testing for localization. Then you just need to do one. As opposed to going through all of the EV/DV whatever testing for 5-6 different cars of the same size, you do it for 1, and that is the bulk of the cost for a development process. Yes you will still have localized spending, but that cost is much less vs having local doing all of their own R&D work. You can have the EU car tuned for response and NA car tuned for isolation, with US car runs on some big Gas V6 and EU car run a 4 cylinder diesel. They can still be sharing the suspension parts, back bone chassis, braking system, driveline components, gas tanks...etc

In VW's case too, yes Jetta in US has torsion beam axle and EU has a IRS, but you can bet you can take the beam straight out and swap for a EU IRS if needed(and in the case of the GLI, which is still build in the same plant, they are doing exactly that, what VW is saving is the BOM cost, reduced part count to boost margin). While Passat now is being heavily regionalized, VW is probably justifying that through the size of the US mid-size market....thats where the bulk of the US market is. At the same time the US Passat still shares much of the parts with the rest of the world car, just riding on a longer unibody....knowing VW they may well find another use for that chassis outside of US...
__________________
University of Toronto Formula SAE Alumni 2003-2007
Formula Student Championship 2003, 2005, 2006
www.fsae.utoronto.ca
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 08-14-2011, 09:25 AM
Dino Scuderia's Avatar
Dino Scuderia Dino Scuderia is offline
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,584
Southeast US
Here's something severely wrong with the state of the car. This commercial asks, 'Where has performance in cars gone?'...then they illustrate that performance is back but in a SUV....not a Viper.

Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 08-14-2011, 03:43 PM
NSXType-R's Avatar
NSXType-R NSXType-R is offline
Furniture
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 11,617
East Coast of the United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacingManiac View Post
MS3 is a 5 door only, and its a decent size car....

Mitsubishi Ralliart Sportsback is a 5 door car also. GTI/Golf/TDI is also a car in that class.

Curious though, why do you need the room?
I dorm at a college and I'd like to get mostly everything in one go.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dino Scuderia View Post
Here's something severely wrong with the state of the car. This commercial asks, 'Where has performance in cars gone?'...then they illustrate that performance is back but in a SUV....not a Viper.
I saw that commercial with my father. We were both very appalled.

Maybe they should be directing us at Dodge Challengers, but not a Durango. I'd buy a SUV if I wanted one.

That was one of the most confusing commercials I had ever seen, especially when they harp on how sporty a Durango is and then end the commercial on a towing statistic.

That's a waste of tax dollars.

Imported from Detroit!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 08-14-2011, 05:13 PM
Ferrer's Avatar
Ferrer Ferrer is offline
Furniture
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 33,277
Barcelona
Send a message via MSN to Ferrer
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacingManiac View Post
Ferrer as Matra said, much of the cost is in the R&D phase, much of the stuff, just because the car may look different, it does not mean that they are different. Suspension components stamping, casting mold, brake system , backbond/subframe tooling, all those are being shared by various model in these cars designed for all the market. The key for an OEM to do when they started out to do this process of unifying their design, is to get all the differing standard around, and build one out of those, one that will satisfy the basic criteria in required testing for localization. Then you just need to do one. As opposed to going through all of the EV/DV whatever testing for 5-6 different cars of the same size, you do it for 1, and that is the bulk of the cost for a development process. Yes you will still have localized spending, but that cost is much less vs having local doing all of their own R&D work. You can have the EU car tuned for response and NA car tuned for isolation, with US car runs on some big Gas V6 and EU car run a 4 cylinder diesel. They can still be sharing the suspension parts, back bone chassis, braking system, driveline components, gas tanks...etc

In VW's case too, yes Jetta in US has torsion beam axle and EU has a IRS, but you can bet you can take the beam straight out and swap for a EU IRS if needed(and in the case of the GLI, which is still build in the same plant, they are doing exactly that, what VW is saving is the BOM cost, reduced part count to boost margin). While Passat now is being heavily regionalized, VW is probably justifying that through the size of the US mid-size market....thats where the bulk of the US market is. At the same time the US Passat still shares much of the parts with the rest of the world car, just riding on a longer unibody....knowing VW they may well find another use for that chassis outside of US...
I do not disagree that cars that are apparently very different actually share many parts inside, and actually not cars from one manufacturer, but from different manufacturers and industrial groups as well, due to sharing the same suppliers.

Still that doesn't detract from the fact that a good number of manufacturers use cars that clearly different in terms of hardware for one market or the other. The aforementioned Hondas and Toyotas are a case in point. even when cars are available in different parts of the world, it's clear which one is the big player in each part, the i30/Elantra being a clear example of this.
__________________
Lack of charisma can be fatal.
Visca Catalunya!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lotus City Car Concept Ecnelis Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out 19 10-06-2010 03:25 PM
how to be a ricer C4Power Car comparison 36 02-03-2009 05:02 PM
Car of the Year Awards 2008 [PLEASE READ FIRST] fisetdavid26 Awards 33 12-04-2008 02:33 PM
She drives like a Chick Niko_Fx Multimedia 15 07-20-2005 06:22 PM
Manual Transmission Orefus Technical forums 16 07-16-2005 10:36 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:11 AM.

 

1998 - 2019 Ultimatecarpage.com