Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 26 of 26

Thread: question about the inherent (sp) durability of FWD

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,488
    Quote Originally Posted by nota View Post
    'Popularised' might be a moot definition, but I recently saw this gearbox layout in a small Lloyd or Hansa (or was it Goliath?) dating well back into the 1950s

    Conversely I've yet to be popularised by a Primula
    I mentioned the Primula because I remember it as one of the first cars with such a layout (I didn't remember the others, and I know we hada thread about that a long time ago), but really the Fiat was the one that made it popular.

    And then came the Golf and there was no going back...
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    4,031
    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrer View Post
    I mentioned the Primula because I remember it as one of the first cars with such a layout (I didn't remember the others, and I know we hada thread about that a long time ago), but really the Fiat was the one that made it popular.

    And then came the Golf and there was no going back...
    Speaking of going back didn't the '73 Civic predate the '74 Golf?

    Btw as a pure guess I imagine the popular '67-intro Honda N360 might also share this layout...

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,488
    Quote Originally Posted by nota View Post
    Speaking of going back didn't the '73 Civic predate the '74 Golf?

    Btw as a pure guess I imagine the popular '67-intro Honda N360 might also share this layout...
    Mmmm... you may be onto something here.

    But nobody is interested in appliances...
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    brisbane - sub-tropical land of mangoes
    Posts
    16,251
    Quote Originally Posted by cmcpokey View Post
    thats funny... the only car i had any CV trouble with (or really heard of any CV trouble with) was my 93 accord. had to replace both half shafts twice, and they needed replacing when i got rid of the car.

    so i would say that fwd is fine for the CVs with the exception of early 90s Hondas.
    it's the vtec!
    Andreas Preuninger, Manager of Porsche High Performance Cars: "Grandmas can use paddles. They aren't challenging."

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Kyushu
    Posts
    6,039
    Quote Originally Posted by clutch-monkey View Post
    it's the vtec!
    umm, my shitty LX only had about 38 hp and no vtec. so i doubt that's the cause. its more likely honda's poor build quality that they're known for.
    Honor. Courage. Commitment. Etcetera.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,508
    Assuming both are competently designed I would give just the slightest nod to RWD. RWD cars with IRS do have CV joints similar to a FWD car but they don't have to articulate as much. Limiting articulation does help boot life. When the boot fails a CV joint failure or CV boot replacement will follow. Aside from that small difference I see no inherent advantage to one over the other.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Bangor Co.Down Northern Ireland
    Posts
    50
    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrer View Post
    The Mini had the gearbox in the sump, actually sharing the same oil.
    just like the peugeot/citroen/renault Douvrin engine then.

    . on the matter of early ninetys hondas. my old 92 civic sir had around 160 bhp and was driven hard and it never ever had any drivetrain problems after 5 years of me owning it from 2000.

    i was impressed with its traction off the line but this may have been helped by its meagre torque at low revs.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Valid point on the boot split being a common cause leading to ultimate CV joint failures !
    The articulation isn't the big issue on the boot but on the forces applied within the joint itself that leasds to ecessive wear and failure.
    RWD has a typical +-10% movement, a joint at the wheel end of a FWD will have +-45%.
    The larger offset puts large amounts of torque into pulling the joint out of place at full lock where most of torque is transmistted through the joint at lower articulation.

    We used to replace the driveshafts on the rally Mini every 2 events. The imp could manage a season on the one set ( of competition ones -- not the original Hillman bits, they were good for a bout a miles )

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    For Tax Purposes, Cayman Islands
    Posts
    14,579
    I have to Say CMC sounds like he got a Bad honda - My family owned a similar vintage Accord sedan in NZ and the only thing that went wrong with that car was a blown light bulb.

    Not trying to be a Honda fanboy, but it just seemed perverse to me that Hondas have a reputation for unreliability.
    <cough> www.charginmahlazer.tumblr.com </cough>

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    yeah weird, Honda are one of the BEST from an engineering and quality of build standpoint !

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Kyushu
    Posts
    6,039
    i was being a bt sarcastic with that remark. that car was unbreakable in every other way. it had 170k when i traded it in for the Mini, and i did not take care of it. the battery was dead and had to jump it to drive it to the shop, and the AC needed new freon (new orleans in the summer with no AC is awesome) but those are the only things. it used to drive me the 800 miles from home to school numerous times a year. a friend of the family also had a 93 accord LX, and she also had to fairly regularly replace her halfshafts. it may just be that year/generation that has the trouble, because as i said, thats the only car i have heard that has a problem with it.
    Honor. Courage. Commitment. Etcetera.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •