Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: GM's troubles lead to cuts in racing programs.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Southeast US
    Posts
    5,582

    GM's troubles lead to cuts in racing programs.

    Excerpt:

    So, what does this mean for GM Racing going forward? Here are the five key actions on the table right now at GM:

    1. Immediate cuts to NASCAR promotional programs. Ever go to a NASCAR weekend and notice the Chevrolet billboards around the track, or attend Chevy-sponsored events surrounding a race weekend, or go to the "Chevy Rock and Roll 400," or see co-branded promotions in grocery stores or auto parts stores featuring Chevy NASCAR drivers? GM spends millions of dollars on these programs every year, and these are the deals that will come under immediate scrutiny. Some track contracts have already been cancelled, and other contracts with individual tracks expiring at the end of this year will not be renewed. Ongoing contracts will come under heavy fire. And a lot of the small promotions that add up to a significant chunk of change will fall by the wayside. It doesn't sound like much, but believe me, to the tracks involved this will have a huge impact.

    2. Immediate cuts to NASCAR-themed advertising spending. The ubiquitous Chevrolet spots on NASCAR broadcasts will be cut by 20 percent right off the top. This is probably the most painless cut GM can do, unless you're on the receiving end of it as a TV network media honcho, or at a media company that has the responsibility of placing that ad, that is.

    3. All team and driver contracts will be put on the table for immediate review. That deal that Tony Stewart just signed to receive half of Haas-CNC Racing, so it can become Stewart-Haas Racing in 2009? There was GM Racing money involved in that deal, or it wouldn't have happened. But by participating in that deal, GM Racing also has set the table for its entire technical partnership fee structure with its NASCAR teams to be reviewed, given the company-wide mandate to take 20 percent out of its marketing/promotion/advertising budgets. The deal with GM Racing is this: The technical aspect of GM Racing reports up through engineering and GM Powertrain and has a budget assigned to it. But the actual serious money involved which supports these sponsorship deals and other programs comes out of GM Marketing. Last fall, GM signed Hendrick Motorsports, Richard Childress Racing and DEI, Inc. to contract extensions of varying lengths. The man at GM marketing who made those deals happen - Brent Dewar - a known NASCAR "friend" and cheerleader, has since been shipped off to Europe. Needless to say, there are people within GM marketing and the rest of the corporation who are clearly not happy with some of Dewar's decisions. Now, every single one of those decisions has been put on the table for review and discussion, with GM going back to the teams for "adjustments" to their contracts not out of the question. Look for those "adjustments" to translate into a percentage cutback to the direct payouts to the teams, and don't be be surprised if the low man team on the GM NASCAR totem pole is given its outright release with a cash buyout by the end of this year.

    4. GM may stay in NASCAR - at least for now - but to what degree? All of these reductions in GM Racing's involvement in NASCAR begs the question, as in, if GM stays, to what degree will their involvement "cover" NASCAR? Keeping a presence in Craftsman Truck and maintaining a reduced presence in Sprint Cup may be all that's left for GM's NASCAR budget. GM will race where and when they see fit, but look for the Nationwide Series to become the odd man out when it comes to GM Racing's involvement. And if teams are given the choice to cut their programs in response to GM's demands, watch their Nationwide programs drop off the map too.

    5. Corvette Racing caught in the crossfire? It appears that a direct result of the additional juice necessary to make the Tony Stewart deal happen is that Corvette Racing may take a big hit. One scenario already on the table is that Corvette's annual appearance at the 24 Hours of Le Mans might be in jeopardy, which would be a complete travesty because that one single race is the raison d'etre for the entire Corvette Racing program. The global image enhancement and benefits to GM, Chevrolet and the Corvette brand because of the success of Corvette Racing at that one race - the most prestigious endurance road racing event in the world - is almost incalculable. But it takes a lot of money to present a front line two-car GT effort at Le Mans, and it is rumored that 1/3 of Corvette Racing's annual budget is consumed at that one race. So that's why the discussion is on the table. It doesn't help that the internal NASCAR cheerleaders within GM (at least the few who are left) regularly dismiss Corvette Racing as an afterthought, but the reality of the situation is that Corvette racing's annual budget is approximately equal to a top one-car effort in NASCAR's Sprint Cup, so the arguments to decimate Corvette Racing fall flat in the Big Picture of things. As we like to say around here, this is a "developing" situation, and the next 60 days will determine Corvette racing's fate for 2009 and beyond.

    There's a lot to contemplate in this column by any measure, but one thing is crystal clear: The days of NASCAR dictating to the manufacturers is clearly over. GM upper management has stated publicly that they will reduce the company's motorsports programs by at least 20 percent. And since NASCAR-related spending accounts for 90 percent of GM Racing's total annual budget - or between $120 and $140 million - the cuts are going to be deep, highly visible, and they will signal a fundamental change in one Detroit automobile company's historical relationship with NASCAR.

    Oh and one more thing, if you think GM is the only Detroit manufacturer contemplating substantial or even radical cuts to their NASCAR programs, think again.

    Fumes - Autoextremist.com ~ the bare-knuckled, unvarnished, high octane truth...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,489
    Not exactly surprising.
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    East Coast of the United States
    Posts
    12,007
    You gotta do what you gotta do. The least important stuff goes first.

    I actually like these new changes. I hated the IN YOUR FACE advertising done by GM in Motortrend, where they had huge cardboard billboards glued into the issue or had 6 page spreads of their car lineup, and information showing how fuel efficient they were on the highway.

    Shame about the C6R though. Real racing should be given more priorety.

    On a sidenote, anyone remember Autoshow in Motion? It was a GM sponsored event, I think in Long Ilsand either in 2004 or 2005. I have a shirt from that event. The whole point of it was to test drive GM cars (mainly, Acura had TLs up there). I wonder if they ever followed up. The main attraction was the C5 Corvette. You had to be chaparoned to drive that car.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    421
    They should get out of NASCAR and continue in the American Le Mans Series.
    Should Comcast, which is buying NBC, have more motorsports coverage on VERSUS and now NBC? Does North America need a racing tv channel? Find the answer to that exact question on facebook.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    The land of the free and home of the whopper!
    Posts
    172
    Quote Originally Posted by togos452 View Post
    They should get out of NASCAR and continue in the American Le Mans Series.
    Then it would just be the NASCAR Toyota series, as it seems this year the only drivers who are winning are the Chevy teams and the Toyota teams.
    roflcopter

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,328
    no word about the rumoured LMP1 car, with the LS6 production engine?
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Chattanooga, TN
    Posts
    195
    Quote Originally Posted by TS020 View Post
    Then it would just be the NASCAR Toyota series, as it seems this year the only drivers who are winning are the Chevy teams and the Toyota teams.
    Sounds like a plan.
    "That's the first time I've been unhappy to have a bird on my face."


    -Jenson Button after having a bird hit him during a preseason practice

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    The land of the free and home of the whopper!
    Posts
    172
    Quote Originally Posted by ptclaus98 View Post
    Sounds like a plan.
    It's bad enough that the Cup series runs a spec chassis where only decals and engines differentiate a Chevy from a Ford and a Dodge from a Toyota, taking it to where all cars and engines are the same would ruin it. Look what the spec chassis/engine formula did for Champ Car and IndyCar, it ran Champ Car into bankruptcy and it makes the IndyCar series irrelevant to the mainstream where they series was born on innovation and preparing technology to take from those race cars to the street cars you see and drive.
    roflcopter

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    421
    Quote Originally Posted by TS020 View Post
    Then it would just be the NASCAR Toyota series, as it seems this year the only drivers who are winning are the Chevy teams and the Toyota teams.
    Toyota in NASCAR to sell pickup trucks

    (so why are they in F1?)

    Toyota raises dust in NASCAR - AutoWeek Magazine

    Quote Originally Posted by TS020 View Post
    It's bad enough that the Cup series runs a spec chassis where only decals and engines differentiate a Chevy from a Ford and a Dodge from a Toyota, taking it to where all cars and engines are the same would ruin it. Look what the spec chassis/engine formula did for Champ Car and IndyCar, it ran Champ Car into bankruptcy and it makes the IndyCar series irrelevant to the mainstream where they series was born on innovation and preparing technology to take from those race cars to the street cars you see and drive.
    Yes, but there is no automotive relevancy in NASCAR except for the brakes.

    The 2011 IndyCar Series will at least have non-spec engines.

    AUTO-RACING - INDYCAR: Impressive Guest List at Engine Summit - SPEEDtv.com
    Should Comcast, which is buying NBC, have more motorsports coverage on VERSUS and now NBC? Does North America need a racing tv channel? Find the answer to that exact question on facebook.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    The land of the free and home of the whopper!
    Posts
    172
    Quote Originally Posted by togos452 View Post
    Toyota in NASCAR to sell pickup trucks

    (so why are they in F1?)
    Because they have $500 million to spend without worrying about going out of business?

    Quote Originally Posted by togos452 View Post
    Yes, but there is no automotive relevancy in NASCAR except for the brakes.
    Considering how the series was made successful based off the principle of 'Race on Sunday, Sell on Monday', and how the series use to race actual stock cars, instead of purpose built race cars that aren't even based off their street car counterparts.
    roflcopter

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Wishing I was in Moscow, Idaho
    Posts
    2,585
    Quote Originally Posted by TS020 View Post
    Because they have $500 million to spend without worrying about going out of business?



    Considering how the series was made successful based off the principle of 'Race on Sunday, Sell on Monday', and how the series use to race actual stock cars, instead of purpose built race cars that aren't even based off their street car counterparts.
    Crappy purpose built cars at that.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    The land of the free and home of the whopper!
    Posts
    172
    Quote Originally Posted by wwgkd View Post
    Crappy purpose built cars at that.
    Yeah, the COT is an ugly car, but all the safety features don't help it's uglyness.
    roflcopter

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Chattanooga, TN
    Posts
    195
    Quote Originally Posted by TS020 View Post
    It's bad enough that the Cup series runs a spec chassis where only decals and engines differentiate a Chevy from a Ford and a Dodge from a Toyota, taking it to where all cars and engines are the same would ruin it. Look what the spec chassis/engine formula did for Champ Car and IndyCar, it ran Champ Car into bankruptcy and it makes the IndyCar series irrelevant to the mainstream where they series was born on innovation and preparing technology to take from those race cars to the street cars you see and drive.
    Killing NASCAR? I'll live.
    "That's the first time I've been unhappy to have a bird on my face."


    -Jenson Button after having a bird hit him during a preseason practice

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Bathurst 1000
    By Monty_Burns in forum Racing forums
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: 10-13-2007, 07:07 PM
  2. V8 Supercars: Rnd 2 Bigpond 400, Perth
    By fpv_gtho in forum Racing forums
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03-25-2007, 05:20 AM
  3. Probable Entry List for Le Mans
    By Zytek_Fan in forum Racing forums
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 09-01-2006, 07:16 AM
  4. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-03-2005, 05:10 PM
  5. Ford Mustang Racing Prototype 2004
    By Matt in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-29-2004, 04:31 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •