Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: Lawsuit against NASCAR?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    201

    Lawsuit against NASCAR?

    Has anyone heard about this? Apparently NASCAR's being sued by some track owner who's throwing a temper tantrum because his track isn't being used by NASCAR. I hope NASCAR fights this, it seems like it could really alter the way the tracks are chosen if they let a lawyer make the decision for them like this. A friend of mine was at the race a few weeks back and told me she was asked to sign a petition about it, which is how I heard of it--they have a website as well.

    What are people's thoughts on this? Anyone heard about it?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    True North
    Posts
    7,682
    Lol i dont know if you'll get much support here...but come on guys, what if they did this to le mans?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    6,369
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Canuck
    Lol i dont know if you'll get much support here...but come on guys, what if they did this to le mans?
    They wouldn't. Le Mans brings way too much tourism and money to La Sarthe.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,488
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Canuck
    Lol i dont know if you'll get much support here...but come on guys, what if they did this to le mans?
    In fact it's worse, they are planning on ending racing at Monza for noise concerns I think...
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    6,369
    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrer
    In fact it's worse, they are planning on ending racing at Monza for noise concerns I think...
    Everything except for F1
    LMS round got moved to Jarama, and FIA GT round was moved to Adria.
    Last edited by Zytek_Fan; 06-21-2006 at 03:37 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    95616
    Posts
    5,357
    they would never cancel Talladega, there is always a huge crash there every year, so canceling it will create huge amounts of pissed off people who like crashes (like me) as long as nobody dies
    I'm dropping out to create a company that starts with motorcycles, then cars, and forty years later signs a legendary Brazilian driver who has a public and expensive feud with his French teammate.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,288
    I think there is another side to this, maybe there was a prior agreement to have it at the track or something. maybe not, but only one side is being represented here, i cant really make an opinion w/o the facts.
    You can call me scott.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    11,391
    Quote Originally Posted by Smithman
    Apparently NASCAR's being sued
    For what, being boring and the official sponsor of alcoholic rednecks everywhere?
    He came dancing across the water
    With his galleons and guns
    Looking for the new world
    In that palace in the sun
    On the shore lay Montezuma
    With his cocoa leaves and pearls

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Tustin, California
    Posts
    969
    just cause NASCAR ain't using the guy's track. what gives him the right to sue??
    I am the Stig


    Ferrari Constructors Champions 2007

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Bay Area, California, U.S., North America, Earth, Solar System, Milky Way,
    Posts
    3,125
    Quote Originally Posted by carsnut
    just cause NASCAR ain't using the guy's track. what gives him the right to sue??
    His beer.
    The Ace of All Aces.

    Crysis. Maximum Game.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Eindhoven, The Netherlands
    Posts
    7,833
    but perhaps they had a contract and the nascar orginisation broke it. In that case they have a good point...

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    If there was an existing contract then yes theyve got a strong point.

    However if its something petty they shouldnt have a leg to stand on. After seeing the latest US GP lawsuit get thrown out this shouldnt have too many issues if its as straight forward as it seems
    I am the Stig

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    201
    Found another website with some more information on this. My apologies to the F1 fans--as someone said, imagine if they were doing it to Le Mans!

    http://thetracksuit.info/

    This link has more background on the case: http://thetracksuit.info/background.html

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    land of the Desert Extreme Challenge Rally
    Posts
    5,499
    Smithman, when it comes to LeMans or F1 or WRC like they have many times, it's because each rally or track has a certain feature that makes it special. Like in F1, the Monaco GP has a charisma which, as technically brilliant as it is, the Bahrain cannot capture, but in turn it IS technically brilliant. WRC Monte Carlo has the same which another tarmac rallye like France wouldn't be able to replace, but then again in turn with France spectators get to see the cars tackle a billion corners one after another. Many of us just cannot imagine how much difference a NASCAR track makes because it is all a big oval anyway, whereever you go. What makes one so different? The paint colour? The smell? The grass? Hope you catch my point.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    201
    I see what you're saying, but as someone who's gotten into NASCAR, I have to say that not all tracks are as similar as one might think. Look at Talladega, for instance--it's the longest track on the Nextel circuit, and the fact that the finish line is after the pit exit is unique and has made for some interesting finishes in the past. Talladega's also the fastest track in the circuit. So while I can see how to an outsider it looks the same as all the rest, it's simply not.

    With that in mind, I just can't imagine how NASCAR would let some rich guy's lawyer push them around and make them cancel races on the tracks with so much history, like Talladega, for some guy's fancy new track that he thinks should be a part of the circuit instead.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Scientology to Sponsor NASCAR
    By SilverG35SportC in forum Miscellaneous
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 06-11-2006, 05:17 PM
  2. If you hated Speed TV before
    By CSL in forum Racing forums
    Replies: 80
    Last Post: 01-23-2006, 11:10 AM
  3. Toyota in NASCAR?
    By Acura/subarufan in forum Racing forums
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 09-02-2005, 11:01 AM
  4. What's up with Nascar?
    By KnifeEdge_2K1 in forum Racing forums
    Replies: 105
    Last Post: 07-04-2004, 08:35 AM
  5. NASCAR commentators
    By Coventrysucks in forum Racing forums
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-06-2004, 05:44 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •