Go to Ultimatecarpage.com

Go Back   Ultimatecarpage.com forums > General forums > Miscellaneous


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #691  
Old 02-13-2012, 09:10 PM
jcp123's Avatar
jcp123 jcp123 is offline
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,138
Californian by nature, living in Teggsas.
Send a message via AIM to jcp123
Do it! That would be fun to see
__________________
An it harm none, do as ye will

Approximately 79% of statistics are made up.
Reply With Quote
  #692  
Old 02-14-2012, 12:27 AM
Fleet 500's Avatar
Fleet 500 Fleet 500 is offline
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,788
San Fernando Valley, Calif.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcp123 View Post
Do it! That would be fun to see
I did refuel on Friday. (Not filled the tank, just put in $20 worth like I usually do.) I plan to drive it a little more than I have been, so it shouldn't take too long to see the "results." I hope it still gets at least 10 mpg. I have been driving it efficiently... no full-throttle and no burnouts (the '69 Fleetwood and '66 Plymouth are for that).

I know of a friend in Australia who like big '70s American cars. He bought a '77 Lincoln Continental through someone he knew here in the U.S. (in Pennsylvania).

It does have the 460-cu-in engine. He was also hoping it would get at least 10 mpg and was very disappointed when it was getting only 6-9 mpg! So he had it converted to LPG.
__________________
'76 Cadillac Fleetwood Seventy-Five Limousine, '95 Lincoln Town Car.
Reply With Quote
  #693  
Old 03-31-2012, 02:02 AM
Fleet 500's Avatar
Fleet 500 Fleet 500 is offline
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,788
San Fernando Valley, Calif.
I refueled the limo. Haven't added any fuel since Feb. 10.

Mileage worked out to 9.2 mpg. It was 100% surface street driving. No highway driving at all and the A/C was on a few times.

Past records show 9-12.5 mpg, so it's getting the same as it always was. If I remember, I'll check it again next time I refuel, but I don't expect any big changes. Good thing I don't use it for daily commuting!
__________________
'76 Cadillac Fleetwood Seventy-Five Limousine, '95 Lincoln Town Car.
Reply With Quote
  #694  
Old 04-01-2012, 08:45 PM
csl177's Avatar
csl177 csl177 is offline
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,709
Way Down South
Have been traveling a lot lately with different cars and the results have been interesting.

Took our 356 to a car show in Lakeland, 178 miles away and burned 15.4 gallons for the round trip: 23MPG
Much better than previously though it is hard not to boot it. Fun to drive with lots of power.

Drove the '67 911S 323 miles to Amelia Island, then 258 miles to Sebring... just 23.6 gallons: 24.6MPG
Surprised it returned better economy than the 356 since I hammered it on the interstate going North (made the hotel in 4:05)
but mainly cruised back roads to the races.

Last entry in the VW Bus log showed the usual 32MPG.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Florida Owners Group GOF 2012 001.jpg (1.01 MB, 7 views)
File Type: jpg Road Trip 2012 Amelia & Sebring 004.jpg (1.01 MB, 7 views)
File Type: jpg Road Trip 2012 Amelia & Sebring 044.jpg (1.11 MB, 7 views)
__________________
'62 356S Notchback Hotrod
'64 VW Microbus 21 Deluxe
'67 911S Das Geburtstagsgeschenk
'68 911T Targa Sporto
'68 Mercedes 280 SL
'62 BMW 700 Sport
'63 BMW 700 Cabriolet
'72 BMW 3.0CSL
'72 BMW 3.0CSA
'70 914/6 GT
Reply With Quote
  #695  
Old 04-01-2012, 11:54 PM
Kitdy's Avatar
Kitdy Kitdy is offline
Furniture
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 10,073
Amazing! Our City Golf gets between 20 and 21 mpg!
Reply With Quote
  #696  
Old 04-02-2012, 03:44 AM
f6fhellcat13's Avatar
f6fhellcat13 f6fhellcat13 is offline
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,219
└A & Connecticlump
Send a message via AIM to f6fhellcat13 Send a message via MSN to f6fhellcat13
How leadfooted are you? That is pretty poor.
__________________
"Kimi, can you improve on your [race] finish?"
"No. My Finnish is fine; I am from Finland. Do you have any water?"
Reply With Quote
  #697  
Old 04-03-2012, 07:20 AM
Kitdy's Avatar
Kitdy Kitdy is offline
Furniture
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 10,073
Quote:
Originally Posted by f6fhellcat13 View Post
How leadfooted are you? That is pretty poor.
I... I don't know. I have been driving more aggressively in the pat year or so. The USAmerican fuel.gov website says city is 21 mpg with the 2L, and getting the city rating seems to be somewhat normal when I read the mags.

I would chock it up to VW shittiness, combined with my "less restrained" driving style. Maybe I will try to smooth it out for a tank or two to compare.
Reply With Quote
  #698  
Old 04-03-2012, 08:11 AM
drakkie's Avatar
drakkie drakkie is offline
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,827
Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Today me and my colleague did approximately 30l/100km. Now you guys try and guess what vehicle this was in..
Reply With Quote
  #699  
Old 04-03-2012, 09:59 AM
Rizaven's Avatar
Rizaven Rizaven is offline
Novice
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 82
Best mileage I ever had on my current car, 1995 Lexus ES300, was on a trip to Reno, 23 MPG on the way up, On the way back 26 MPG. I didn't shift to neutral on the downhill trip. I've been told never to leave the car on neutral for more than a minute with the engine running. I'd love to try the same trip with a manual transmission.

I had a Mercedes Benz 240D that had reverse numbers, 22 MPG on Highway Miles and 24 on City driving. Why didn't the Germans realized that the car needed another gear. The darn thing had a top speed of 77 MPH.
Reply With Quote
  #700  
Old 04-03-2012, 11:06 AM
f6fhellcat13's Avatar
f6fhellcat13 f6fhellcat13 is offline
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,219
└A & Connecticlump
Send a message via AIM to f6fhellcat13 Send a message via MSN to f6fhellcat13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kitdy View Post
I... I don't know. I have been driving more aggressively in the pat year or so. The USAmerican fuel.gov website says city is 21 mpg with the 2L, and getting the city rating seems to be somewhat normal when I read the mags.

I would chock it up to VW shittiness, combined with my "less restrained" driving style. Maybe I will try to smoothe it out for a tank or two to compare.
Shittiness, indeed. Two mpg difference between the autos and manuals, dropping the economy below 20mpg in the city for an auto 2.0l. That is pretty awful for a 2,700lb car from not that long ago.
__________________
"Kimi, can you improve on your [race] finish?"
"No. My Finnish is fine; I am from Finland. Do you have any water?"
Reply With Quote
  #701  
Old 04-03-2012, 11:37 AM
NSXType-R's Avatar
NSXType-R NSXType-R is offline
Furniture
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 11,608
East Coast of the United States
The Subaru Forester gets around 22-25, but that's from 2003 I think.

Not great, not too terrible. Heavy car probably.
Reply With Quote
  #702  
Old 04-20-2012, 11:53 AM
RacingManiac's Avatar
RacingManiac RacingManiac is offline
Fanatic
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,457
Switching to 245s have impacted my MPG negatively.....I definitely notice worse reading down despite the much lighter wheel and tire package...2-3MPG down on average...

Also, my car got a whopping 8.6MPG at a track day last Sat....used up almost 1 tank of gas doing just 105 miles...
__________________
University of Toronto Formula SAE Alumni 2003-2007
Formula Student Championship 2003, 2005, 2006
www.fsae.utoronto.ca
Reply With Quote
  #703  
Old 04-20-2012, 04:12 PM
Kitdy's Avatar
Kitdy Kitdy is offline
Furniture
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 10,073
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacingManiac View Post
2-3MPG down on average...
Ah!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #704  
Old 05-01-2012, 08:03 AM
Clivey's Avatar
Clivey Clivey is offline
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,193
Derby, England
After a 300 mile Motorway trip in the C4, fully loaded with 5 people and 3 suitcases, I averaged 48 MPG UK or 40 MPG US driving at 70 MPH. It really could do with a 6th gear though.

The BMW is currently averaging 26 MPG UK or 22 MPG US over a mixture of gentle town driving and country road blasts. It's still the car I'd rather be in though!
__________________
"This is hardcore." - Evo's John Barker on the TVR Tuscan S
Reply With Quote
  #705  
Old 10-07-2012, 06:54 PM
jcp123's Avatar
jcp123 jcp123 is offline
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,138
Californian by nature, living in Teggsas.
Send a message via AIM to jcp123
Been running a steady 38-38,1 mpg on my last three tanks in the Echo (that's 6,189 - 6,173l/100km). Ugly and isn't running at its peak anymore, but a damn fine car it is in some ways. Fall is starting to descend, so we will see if the cooler temperatures outweigh the not-having-to-run-air-con-for-my-todder-daughter-anymore.
__________________
An it harm none, do as ye will

Approximately 79% of statistics are made up.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VE Failing to excite buyers. adrenaline General Automotive 38 10-24-2006 02:25 AM
how funny was the "attention ferrari haters" thread jump15vc General Automotive 1 02-05-2006 10:41 PM
lukehow and Robb Mann thread Matra et Alpine Miscellaneous 43 12-12-2004 06:54 PM
About the enzo thread werty Website discussion 22 09-19-2004 04:03 PM
Changing thread name Rijoh Website discussion 2 07-11-2004 07:33 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:57 PM.

 

© 1998 - 2019 Ultimatecarpage.com